IQM vs. SCHD
IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. IQM is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQM returned 22.22%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
IQM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 40.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return.
IQM
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 40.18%
- 6M
- 38.57%
- 1Y
- 75.07%
- 3Y*
- 37.62%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
IQM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 40.18% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 27.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQM and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IQM and SCHD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IQM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQM
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
IQM
SCHD
Industrials
IQM
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
IQM
SCHD
Utilities
IQM
SCHD
Energy
IQM
SCHD
Communication Services
IQM
SCHD
Healthcare
IQM
SCHD
Basic Materials
IQM
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
IQM
-
SCHD
Financial Services
IQM
-
SCHD
Real Estate
IQM
-
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
IQM
SCHD
IQM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 5.91 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.79 | 14.53 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.49 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.58 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.86 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
IQM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.91% | -33.37% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -4.61% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | -16.13% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.91% | -16.85% | -28.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.40% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -3.32% | -8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 1.88% | +2.61% |
Volatility
IQM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.20% | 2.66% | +6.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.92% | 7.66% | +15.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 10.96% | +17.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 14.38% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.72% | 16.72% | +14.00% |
IQM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQM dropped -44.91% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.
IQM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQM and 0.06% for SCHD.
IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer