IQLT vs. QQQ
IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 10.06%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IQLT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.06%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
IQLT
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
IQLT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 8.35% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQLT and QQQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IQLT and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQLT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQLT
QQQ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IQLT
QQQ
Industrials
IQLT
QQQ
Technology
IQLT
QQQ
Healthcare
IQLT
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IQLT
QQQ
Basic Materials
IQLT
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IQLT
QQQ
Energy
IQLT
QQQ
Utilities
IQLT
QQQ
Communication Services
IQLT
QQQ
Real Estate
IQLT
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQLT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IQLT
QQQ
IQLT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQLT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.93 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 10.86 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQLT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQLT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -82.97% | +50.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -11.96% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -22.77% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.24% | -35.12% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -35.12% | +2.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -4.25% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -32.73% | +26.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.22% | -0.49% |
Volatility
IQLT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is 5.10%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that IQLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQLT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 9.17% | -4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 14.57% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 17.96% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 22.69% | -6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 22.42% | -5.62% |
IQLT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQLT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.47% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQLT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to IQLT (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 10.06% for IQLT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQLT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer