IPX vs. SCHG
IPX (IperionX Limited American Depositary Share) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 3 years, IPX returned 48.13%/yr vs 22.02%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IPX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPX achieves a -31.82% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 5.60% return.
IPX
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -31.57%
- 6M
- -45.56%
- YTD
- -31.82%
- 1Y
- -25.02%
- 3Y*
- 48.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 18.43%
IPX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPX IperionX Limited American Depositary Share | -31.82% | 5.19% | 271.49% | 95.98% | -32.50% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 5.60% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPX and SCHG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, IPX and SCHG have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
IPX
SCHG
IPX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IperionX Limited American Depositary Share (IPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.08 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 3.45 | -4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPX drawdown since its inception was -65.86%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.86% | -34.59% | -31.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.43% | -16.41% | -47.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.86% | -23.39% | -42.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.96% | -2.54% | -56.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -5.19% | -20.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.91% | 5.11% | +28.80% |
Volatility
IPX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
IperionX Limited American Depositary Share (IPX) has a higher volatility of 22.20% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.17%. This indicates that IPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.20% | 5.17% | +17.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.29% | 12.75% | +52.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.76% | 16.33% | +62.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.26% | 22.41% | +68.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.26% | 21.57% | +69.69% |
Dividends
IPX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPX IperionX Limited American Depositary Share | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPX has higher volatility (22.20%) compared to SCHG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPX dropped -65.86% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer