IPO vs. XLK
IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPO is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Renaissance IPO Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPO returned 12.40%/yr vs 26.01%/yr for XLK. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IPO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 29.28% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 33.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.40%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.01% annualized return.
IPO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 33.79%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 32.46%
- 5Y*
- 22.53%
- 10Y*
- 26.01%
IPO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 29.28% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 107.88% | 34.11% | -17.24% | 37.16% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 33.79% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPO and XLK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IPO and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPO
XLK
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Technology
IPO
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
IPO
XLK
-
Healthcare
IPO
XLK
-
Industrials
IPO
XLK
Consumer Defensive
IPO
XLK
-
Communication Services
IPO
XLK
-
Financial Services
IPO
XLK
-
Real Estate
IPO
XLK
-
Energy
IPO
XLK
Utilities
IPO
XLK
-
Basic Materials
IPO
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IPO
XLK
IPO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.84 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 12.30 | -9.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -82.05% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.24% | -15.92% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.04% | -25.66% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -33.56% | -32.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.76% | -33.56% | -35.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.89% | -2.94% | -18.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -34.90% | +11.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.72% | 4.96% | +6.76% |
Volatility
IPO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) is 10.97%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that IPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 11.64% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.55% | 19.23% | +4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.18% | 23.12% | +7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.06% | 25.30% | +10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 24.71% | +6.91% |
IPO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than XLK's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPO and XLK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to IPO (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 26.01% vs 12.40% for IPO. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IPO has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 26.01% return vs 12.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.40% for IPO.
IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer