PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPO vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPO vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 11.10%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.60% annualized return.


IPO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.70%
YTD
24.27%
6M
21.48%
1Y
30.62%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
11.10%

VONG

1D
0.21%
1M
5.36%
YTD
7.40%
6M
6.54%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
18.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPO vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
24.27%5.45%15.68%52.55%-57.26%-10.31%107.88%34.11%-17.24%37.16%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.40%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IPO and VONG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.75

The correlation between IPO and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPO vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPO
VONG

Technology

40.3%
51.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
13.2%

Healthcare

10.8%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
2.7%

Industrials

9.1%
5.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
13.2%

Financial Services

4.3%
5.3%

Real Estate

4.0%
0.4%

Energy

1.1%
0.4%

Utilities

0.3%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Technology

IPO
40.3%
VONG
51.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IPO
14.4%
VONG
13.2%

Healthcare

IPO
10.8%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IPO
9.2%
VONG
2.7%

Industrials

IPO
9.1%
VONG
5.7%

Communication Services

IPO
6.6%
VONG
13.2%

Financial Services

IPO
4.3%
VONG
5.3%

Real Estate

IPO
4.0%
VONG
0.4%

Energy

IPO
1.1%
VONG
0.4%

Utilities

IPO
0.3%
VONG
0.3%

Basic Materials

IPO

-

VONG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPO vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPO vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPOVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.58

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

5.29

-2.66

IPO vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPOVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.67

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.73

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.89

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.90

-0.59

Drawdowns

IPO vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-32.72%

-36.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.24%

-16.23%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.04%

-23.27%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.02%

-32.72%

-33.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

-32.72%

-36.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-1.46%

-23.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-4.88%

-18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.67%

4.84%

+6.83%

Volatility

IPO vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 3.59%. This indicates that IPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

3.59%

+5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.24%

11.61%

+10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.91%

15.36%

+13.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.84%

21.33%

+14.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.49%

20.87%

+10.62%

IPO vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPO vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.46%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPO and VONG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPO has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to VONG (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.60% vs 11.10% for IPO. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.

IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.06% for VONG.

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPO and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer