IPO vs. VONG
IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPO is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Renaissance IPO Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPO returned 11.10%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for VONG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
IPO vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPO achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 11.10%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.60% annualized return.
IPO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 30.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- -1.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.42%
- 10Y*
- 18.60%
IPO vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 24.27% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 107.88% | 34.11% | -17.24% | 37.16% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 7.40% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPO and VONG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IPO and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPO vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPO
VONG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
IPO
VONG
Consumer Cyclical
IPO
VONG
Healthcare
IPO
VONG
Consumer Defensive
IPO
VONG
Industrials
IPO
VONG
Communication Services
IPO
VONG
Financial Services
IPO
VONG
Real Estate
IPO
VONG
Energy
IPO
VONG
Utilities
IPO
VONG
Basic Materials
IPO
-
VONG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPO vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
IPO
VONG
IPO vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.58 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 5.29 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.67 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.73 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.89 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.90 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
IPO vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -32.72% | -36.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.24% | -16.23% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.04% | -23.27% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -32.72% | -33.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.76% | -32.72% | -36.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -1.46% | -23.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -4.88% | -18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.67% | 4.84% | +6.83% |
Volatility
IPO vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 3.59%. This indicates that IPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.57% | 3.59% | +5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.24% | 11.61% | +10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.91% | 15.36% | +13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.84% | 21.33% | +14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.49% | 20.87% | +10.62% |
IPO vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPO vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.46% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPO and VONG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPO has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to VONG (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPO dropped -68.76% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.60% vs 11.10% for IPO. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.
IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.
IPO is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IPO and 0.06% for VONG.
VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPO and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer