IPAR vs. IMMR
IPAR (Inter Parfums, Inc.) and IMMR (Immersion Corporation) are both stocks. IPAR operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while IMMR operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, IPAR returned 16.30%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for IMMR. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IPAR vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAR achieves a 49.29% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAR has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 16.30%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.
IPAR
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- YTD
- 49.29%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- -3.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.84%
IMMR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.30M | $4.82M | $4.30M | |
| $28.31M | $36.49M | $30.17M |
IPAR vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 49.29% | -33.59% | -6.45% | 52.00% | -7.40% | 79.01% | -16.23% | 12.74% | 53.32% | 35.12% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 15.09% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAR and IMMR is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1999 | 0.22 |
The correlation between IPAR and IMMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IPAR:
$3.99B
IMMR:
$250.93M
IPAR:
$6.27
IMMR:
$0.14
IPAR:
19.87
IMMR:
55.32
IPAR:
1.09
IMMR:
0.64
IPAR:
2.67
IMMR:
0.14
IPAR:
4.52
IMMR:
0.84
IPAR:
$1.49B
IMMR:
$1.73B
IPAR:
$955.88M
IMMR:
$360.34M
IPAR:
$291.43M
IMMR:
$78.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAR vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
IPAR
IMMR
IPAR vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPAR | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 1.20 | -0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPAR vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAR drawdown since its inception was -81.82%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAR and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAR | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.82% | -98.66% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.57% | -24.77% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.41% | -56.90% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -56.90% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.94% | -74.29% | +19.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.05% | -88.14% | +74.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -88.21% | +59.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.98% | 10.86% | +9.12% |
Volatility
IPAR vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) is 9.17%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 19.94%. This indicates that IPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAR | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 19.94% | -10.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.14% | 32.97% | -10.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.09% | 43.91% | -13.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.51% | 46.41% | -12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.50% | 51.27% | -14.77% |
Dividends
IPAR vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
IPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than IMMR's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.57% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 2.57% | 3.77% | 2.28% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 0.94% | 0.55% | 1.59% | 1.38% | 1.66% | 1.89% | 2.18% |
Financials
IPAR vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inter Parfums, Inc. and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IPAR vs. IMMR - Profitability Comparison
IPAR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported a gross profit of 224.64M and revenue of 344.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.1%.
IMMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a gross profit of 73.93M and revenue of 270.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
IPAR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported an operating income of 74.13M and revenue of 344.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
IMMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported an operating income of 147.00K and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
IPAR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported a net income of 75.21M and revenue of 344.89M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
IMMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Immersion Corporation reported a net income of 3.73M and revenue of 270.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAR and IMMR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (19.94%) compared to IPAR (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAR dropped -81.82% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
IMMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAR and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer