IPAR vs. ELF
IPAR (Inter Parfums, Inc.) and ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 5 years, IPAR returned 6.14%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for ELF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IPAR vs. ELF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAR achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -31.64% return.
IPAR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- -30.54%
- 3Y*
- -9.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
ELF
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -31.64%
- 6M
- -29.95%
- 1Y
- -54.31%
- 3Y*
- -20.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IPAR vs. ELF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 9.11% | -33.59% | -6.45% | 52.00% | -7.40% | 79.01% | -16.23% | 12.74% | 53.32% | 35.12% |
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | -31.64% | -39.43% | -13.02% | 161.01% | 66.52% | 31.84% | 56.17% | 86.26% | -61.18% | -22.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAR and ELF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
IPAR:
$2.94B
ELF:
$3.12B
IPAR:
$6.26
ELF:
$0.44
IPAR:
14.65
ELF:
117.22
IPAR:
0.80
ELF:
2.62
IPAR:
1.97
ELF:
1.89
IPAR:
3.33
ELF:
2.76
IPAR:
$1.49B
ELF:
$1.64B
IPAR:
$955.88M
ELF:
$1.16B
IPAR:
$291.43M
ELF:
$185.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAR vs. ELF — Risk / Return Rank
IPAR
ELF
IPAR vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAR | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | -0.83 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | -1.01 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.82 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.40 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAR | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | -0.83 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.24 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.13 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
IPAR vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAR drawdown since its inception was -81.82%, which is greater than ELF's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAR and ELF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAR | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.82% | -77.09% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | -65.42% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.41% | -77.09% | +30.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -77.09% | +30.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.19% | -76.16% | +38.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | -32.30% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.29% | 38.32% | -9.03% |
Volatility
IPAR vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) is 9.87%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that IPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAR | ELF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 17.16% | -7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 42.19% | -22.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.66% | 65.82% | -37.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 57.13% | -23.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.84% | 55.15% | -18.31% |
Dividends
IPAR vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison
IPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 3.49% | 3.77% | 2.28% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 0.94% | 0.55% | 1.59% | 1.38% | 1.66% | 1.89% | 2.18% |
Financials
IPAR vs. ELF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inter Parfums, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IPAR vs. ELF - Profitability Comparison
IPAR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported a gross profit of 224.64M and revenue of 344.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.1%.
ELF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.
IPAR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported an operating income of 74.13M and revenue of 344.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
ELF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
IPAR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported a net income of 75.21M and revenue of 344.89M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
ELF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAR and ELF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELF has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to IPAR (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAR dropped -81.82% vs ELF's -77.09%.
ELF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAR and ELF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer