PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAR vs. ELF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IPAR vs. ELF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAR achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -31.64% return.


IPAR

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.02%
YTD
9.11%
6M
15.72%
1Y
-30.54%
3Y*
-9.11%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
14.07%

ELF

1D
-2.82%
1M
-14.07%
YTD
-31.64%
6M
-29.95%
1Y
-54.31%
3Y*
-20.94%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAR vs. ELF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPAR
Inter Parfums, Inc.
9.11%-33.59%-6.45%52.00%-7.40%79.01%-16.23%12.74%53.32%35.12%
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
-31.64%-39.43%-13.02%161.01%66.52%31.84%56.17%86.26%-61.18%-22.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAR and ELF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IPAR:

$2.94B

ELF:

$3.12B

EPS

IPAR:

$6.26

ELF:

$0.44

PE Ratio

IPAR:

14.65

ELF:

117.22

PEG Ratio

IPAR:

0.80

ELF:

2.62

PS Ratio

IPAR:

1.97

ELF:

1.89

PB Ratio

IPAR:

3.33

ELF:

2.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

IPAR:

$1.49B

ELF:

$1.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IPAR:

$955.88M

ELF:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

IPAR:

$291.43M

ELF:

$185.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPAR vs. ELF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAR
IPAR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ELF
ELF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ELF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAR vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPARELFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.07

-0.83

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.45

-1.01

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.86

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.82

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-1.40

+0.36

IPAR vs. ELF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAR Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is comparable to the ELF Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAR and ELF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPARELFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

-0.83

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.24

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.13

+0.17

Drawdowns

IPAR vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAR drawdown since its inception was -81.82%, which is greater than ELF's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAR and ELF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPARELFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.82%

-77.09%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.01%

-65.42%

+22.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.41%

-77.09%

+30.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-77.09%

+30.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.19%

-76.16%

+38.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-32.30%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.29%

38.32%

-9.03%

Volatility

IPAR vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) is 9.87%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that IPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPARELFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

17.16%

-7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.53%

42.19%

-22.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.66%

65.82%

-37.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.36%

57.13%

-23.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.84%

55.15%

-18.31%

Dividends

IPAR vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison

IPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPAR
Inter Parfums, Inc.
3.49%3.77%2.28%1.74%2.07%0.94%0.55%1.59%1.38%1.66%1.89%2.18%

Financials

IPAR vs. ELF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inter Parfums, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
344.89M
449.29M
(IPAR) Total Revenue
(ELF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IPAR vs. ELF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Inter Parfums, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%62.0%64.0%66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%20222023202420252026
65.1%
72.7%
Portfolio components
IPAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported a gross profit of 224.64M and revenue of 344.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.1%.

ELF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.

IPAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported an operating income of 74.13M and revenue of 344.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

ELF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

IPAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter Parfums, Inc. reported a net income of 75.21M and revenue of 344.89M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

ELF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IPAR and ELF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELF has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to IPAR (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAR dropped -81.82% vs ELF's -77.09%.

ELF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPAR and ELF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer