IPAC vs. IDEV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IPAC (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAC is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific IMI Index (Net), while IDEV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPAC returned 8.37%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for IDEV. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IPAC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.

Performance

IPAC vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 11.37% return.

IPAC

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.87%
• 6M: 7.59%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: 8.82%
• ALL TIME*: 7.31%

IDEV

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 6.43%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 1Y: 25.30%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	$135.88M	$124.12M	$125.37M
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	$5.46M	$8.24M	$8.98M

IPAC vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	14.24%	25.16%	6.18%	14.51%	-13.68%	3.09%	12.39%	19.44%	-12.78%	17.32%
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	11.37%	32.56%	4.54%	17.36%	-14.99%	13.00%	8.32%	23.12%	-14.10%	17.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAC and IDEV is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017	0.89

The correlation between IPAC and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPAC vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAC	IDEV
Financial Services	24.9%	24.8%
Industrials	20.5%	18.4%
Technology	13.7%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	7.6%
Basic Materials	8.3%	7.5%
Healthcare	5.4%	8.7%
Real Estate	5.0%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	6.0%
Communication Services	3.8%	3.9%
Energy	1.7%	5.0%
Utilities	1.6%	3.5%

Return for Risk

IPAC vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPAC

IPAC Risk / Return Rank: 67
IPAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IPAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IPAC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
IPAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
IPAC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

IDEV

IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 71
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPAC vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAC	IDEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.66	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.34	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.24	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.11	8.85	-0.74

IPAC vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAC and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAC vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and IDEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAC	IDEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.99%	-34.77%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-11.20%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	-13.41%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.64%	-29.15%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-0.72%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-6.47%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	2.83%	+0.46%

Volatility

IPAC vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.44%. This indicates that IPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAC	IDEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	4.44%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.93%	13.19%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	15.21%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	16.36%	+0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	17.25%	-0.60%

IPAC vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IPAC vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than IDEV's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	3.18%	3.40%	3.30%	3.07%	2.69%	3.05%	2.00%	3.18%	3.16%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	3.86%	4.32%	3.43%	3.16%	2.76%	4.03%	1.68%	3.37%	2.95%	2.98%	2.66%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAC and IDEV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IPAC and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IPAC or IDEV?

IPAC has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to IDEV (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAC dropped -30.99% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

Which ETF is better, IPAC or IDEV?

On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 9.25% vs 8.37% for IPAC. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAC or IDEV?

Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAC or IDEV?

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IPAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAC or IDEV?

IPAC has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.18% for IDEV.

What is the main difference between IPAC and IDEV?

IPAC is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IDEV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IPAC tracks MSCI Pacific IMI Index (Net), while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IPAC and 0.05% for IDEV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.