PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONQ vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IONQ vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONQ achieves a 52.06% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return.


IONQ

1D
-4.44%
1M
49.14%
YTD
52.06%
6M
40.25%
1Y
71.39%
3Y*
94.87%
5Y*
46.53%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-3.17%
1M
3.54%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-10.15%
1Y
-6.96%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONQ vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
52.06%7.42%237.13%259.13%-79.34%54.63%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-11.24%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%55.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IONQ and MSFT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021

0.37

The correlation between IONQ and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IONQ:

$25.33B

MSFT:

$3.18T

EPS

IONQ:

$0.86

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

IONQ:

79.15

MSFT:

25.45

PS Ratio

IONQ:

117.20

MSFT:

10.01

PB Ratio

IONQ:

5.09

MSFT:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

IONQ:

$187.12M

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IONQ:

$71.25M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

IONQ:

$405.86M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONQ vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONQ vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IONQMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.97

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

-0.21

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

-0.44

+2.38

IONQ vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONQ and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IONQMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

-0.28

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.75

-0.33

Drawdowns

IONQ vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONQ drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONQ and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONQMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-69.38%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.61%

-33.91%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.61%

-33.91%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.00%

-37.15%

-52.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.88%

-20.67%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.03%

-21.78%

-29.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.91%

15.95%

+20.96%

Volatility

IONQ vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a higher volatility of 30.10% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.95%. This indicates that IONQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONQMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.10%

9.95%

+20.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.00%

22.34%

+44.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.60%

25.12%

+66.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.10%

26.63%

+73.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.40%

27.04%

+70.36%

Dividends

IONQ vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

IONQ vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IonQ, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
64.67M
82.89B
(IONQ) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IONQ and MSFT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONQ has higher volatility (30.10%) compared to MSFT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONQ dropped -90.00% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONQ and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer