PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTZ vs. BBAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTZ vs. BBAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTZ achieves a -38.26% return, which is significantly lower than BBAI's -30.19% return.


INTZ

1D
-0.15%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
-38.26%
6M
-44.96%
1Y
-66.35%
3Y*
-69.24%
5Y*
-70.08%
10Y*
-19.22%

BBAI

1D
-1.57%
1M
-9.81%
YTD
-30.19%
6M
-38.40%
1Y
-9.81%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTZ vs. BBAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INTZ
Intrusion Inc.
-38.26%-62.60%-39.23%-91.99%-8.14%-15.27%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
-30.19%21.35%107.94%217.65%-88.10%-27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between INTZ and BBAI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.19

The correlation between INTZ and BBAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTZ:

$14.39M

BBAI:

$17.83B

EPS

INTZ:

-$0.52

BBAI:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

INTZ:

2.29

BBAI:

67.25

PB Ratio

INTZ:

3.89

BBAI:

22.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTZ:

$6.21M

BBAI:

$127.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTZ:

$4.70M

BBAI:

$32.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

INTZ:

-$9.70M

BBAI:

-$230.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTZ vs. BBAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTZ
INTZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
INTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
INTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAI
BBAI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BBAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTZ vs. BBAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTZBBAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.06

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.15

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-0.24

-1.08

INTZ vs. BBAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the BBAI Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTZ and BBAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTZ vs. BBAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than BBAI's maximum drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTZ and BBAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTZBBAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-95.01%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.00%

-65.88%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.55%

-75.56%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.87%

-70.29%

-29.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.89%

-70.79%

+13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.96%

40.24%

+9.72%

Volatility

INTZ vs. BBAI - Volatility Comparison

Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) has a higher volatility of 29.14% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) at 23.36%. This indicates that INTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTZBBAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.14%

23.36%

+5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.46%

55.60%

+9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.85%

96.52%

-11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

220.22%

174.20%

+46.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

178.88%

174.20%

+4.68%

Dividends

INTZ vs. BBAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTZ nor BBAI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INTZ vs. BBAI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intrusion Inc. and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
888.00K
34.44M
(INTZ) Total Revenue
(BBAI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INTZ and BBAI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTZ has higher volatility (29.14%) compared to BBAI (23.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTZ dropped -99.94% vs BBAI's -95.01%.

BBAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTZ and BBAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer