PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTZ vs. BBAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTZ vs. BBAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTZ achieves a -26.53% return, which is significantly lower than BBAI's -5.37% return.


INTZ

1D
8.96%
1M
7.02%
YTD
-26.53%
6M
-36.95%
1Y
-49.71%
3Y*
-67.84%
5Y*
-69.99%
10Y*
-17.80%

BBAI

1D
-4.31%
1M
23.43%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-11.74%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
36.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTZ vs. BBAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INTZ
Intrusion Inc.
-26.53%-62.60%-39.23%-91.99%-8.14%-14.21%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
-5.37%21.35%107.94%217.65%-88.10%-35.09%

Correlation

The correlation between INTZ and BBAI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021

0.19

The correlation between INTZ and BBAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTZ:

$17.13M

BBAI:

$24.17B

EPS

INTZ:

-$0.52

BBAI:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

INTZ:

2.73

BBAI:

91.16

PB Ratio

INTZ:

4.63

BBAI:

30.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTZ:

$6.21M

BBAI:

$127.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTZ:

$4.70M

BBAI:

$32.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

INTZ:

-$9.70M

BBAI:

-$230.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTZ vs. BBAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTZ
INTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
INTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
INTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAI
BBAI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BBAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTZ vs. BBAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTZBBAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

0.30

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.58

1.27

-1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.13

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

0.35

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

0.60

-1.34

INTZ vs. BBAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the BBAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTZ and BBAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTZBBAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.30

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

-0.07

-0.03

Drawdowns

INTZ vs. BBAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than BBAI's maximum drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTZ and BBAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTZBBAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-95.01%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.98%

-65.88%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.86%

-75.56%

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.85%

-59.73%

-40.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.74%

-70.89%

+14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.16%

38.23%

+8.93%

Volatility

INTZ vs. BBAI - Volatility Comparison

Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) have volatilities of 20.13% and 20.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTZBBAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.13%

20.75%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.97%

57.00%

+6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.27%

97.63%

-6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

220.08%

175.10%

+44.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

178.81%

175.10%

+3.71%

Dividends

INTZ vs. BBAI - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTZ nor BBAI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INTZ vs. BBAI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intrusion Inc. and BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
888.00K
34.44M
(INTZ) Total Revenue
(BBAI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INTZ and BBAI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBAI has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to INTZ (20.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTZ dropped -99.94% vs BBAI's -95.01%.

BBAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTZ and BBAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer