INTR vs. MFG
INTR (Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares) and MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, INTR returned 26.96%/yr vs 50.32%/yr for MFG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTR vs. MFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTR achieves a -30.74% return, which is significantly lower than MFG's 29.23% return.
INTR
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -19.56%
- YTD
- -30.74%
- 6M
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -15.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFG
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 31.21%
- 1Y
- 73.14%
- 3Y*
- 50.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
INTR vs. MFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTR Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares | -30.74% | 103.99% | -23.68% | 134.60% | -31.90% |
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 29.23% | 54.60% | 47.85% | 26.14% | 29.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTR and MFG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between INTR and MFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INTR:
$2.58B
MFG:
$115.41B
INTR:
$3.19
MFG:
$101.00
INTR:
1.82
MFG:
0.09
INTR:
0.00
MFG:
0.00
INTR:
0.16
MFG:
0.01
INTR:
0.26
MFG:
0.01
INTR:
$15.78B
MFG:
$8.66T
INTR:
$6.47B
MFG:
$4.12T
INTR:
$1.99B
MFG:
$1.63T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTR vs. MFG — Risk / Return Rank
INTR
MFG
INTR vs. MFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTR | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.39 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 2.97 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 7.91 | -8.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTR | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 2.43 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.02 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
INTR vs. MFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTR drawdown since its inception was -68.40%, smaller than the maximum MFG drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTR and MFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTR | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.40% | -80.57% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.77% | -24.78% | -17.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.36% | -28.33% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.47% | -6.24% | -36.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.47% | -60.91% | +40.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.02% | 9.28% | +6.74% |
Volatility
INTR vs. MFG - Volatility Comparison
Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares (INTR) has a higher volatility of 23.30% compared to Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) at 9.44%. This indicates that INTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTR | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.30% | 9.44% | +13.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.54% | 23.65% | +15.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.92% | 30.33% | +19.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.71% | 29.59% | +34.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.71% | 26.47% | +37.24% |
Dividends
INTR vs. MFG - Dividend Comparison
INTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than MFG's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTR Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares | 1.95% | 0.94% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 0.99% | 2.68% | 3.20% | 3.73% | 4.34% | 2.76% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.86% | 3.77% | 3.10% |
Financials
INTR vs. MFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTR vs. MFG - Profitability Comparison
INTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported a gross profit of 1.69B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
MFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
INTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported an operating income of 468.19M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
MFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
INTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inter & Co. Inc. Class A Common Shares reported a net income of 387.40M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
MFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTR and MFG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTR has higher volatility (23.30%) compared to MFG (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTR dropped -68.40% vs MFG's -80.57%.
MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTR and MFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer