INTF vs. FNDC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC).
INTF and FNDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INTF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 28, 2015. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both INTF and FNDC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INTF or FNDC.
Performance
INTF vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than FNDC's 1.78% return.
INTF
6.69%
-3.17%
-0.88%
13.57%
5.66%
N/A
FNDC
1.78%
-3.35%
0.20%
9.36%
4.17%
5.20%
Key characteristics
| INTF | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | 0.72 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.70 | 0.68 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.03 | 3.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.72% | 3.03% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.87% | 13.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.39% | -43.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.74% | -8.52% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INTF vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between INTF and FNDC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INTF vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INTF vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison
INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than FNDC's 2.89% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 3.56% | 3.59% | 2.81% | 5.38% | 2.06% | 3.65% | 2.62% | 3.25% | 1.66% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 2.89% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.96% | 1.30% | 1.61% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
INTF vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and FNDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INTF vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) at 3.63%. This indicates that INTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.