INSG vs. BEEM
INSG (Inseego Corp.) and BEEM (Beam Global) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INSG in Communication Equipment, BEEM in Solar. Over the past 10 years, INSG returned -4.23%/yr vs -15.23%/yr for BEEM. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INSG vs. BEEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than BEEM's -7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, INSG has outperformed BEEM with an annualized return of -4.23%, while BEEM has yielded a comparatively lower -15.23% annualized return.
INSG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -17.37%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- -2.64%
- 1Y
- 37.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- -37.00%
- 10Y*
- -4.23%
BEEM
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -20.11%
- 1Y
- -4.14%
- 3Y*
- -49.08%
- 5Y*
- -48.78%
- 10Y*
- -15.23%
INSG vs. BEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSG Inseego Corp. | 0.49% | 0.10% | 366.79% | -73.91% | -85.55% | -62.31% | 111.05% | 76.63% | 157.76% | -34.02% |
BEEM Beam Global | -7.33% | -52.68% | -55.29% | -59.42% | -6.08% | -74.79% | 1,483.26% | -52.21% | 30.00% | 4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between INSG and BEEM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2010 | 0.18 |
The correlation between INSG and BEEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INSG:
$168.80M
BEEM:
$23.37M
INSG:
$0.84
BEEM:
-$1.62
INSG:
0.95
BEEM:
0.82
INSG:
$168.85M
BEEM:
$28.24M
INSG:
$64.27M
BEEM:
$3.52M
INSG:
$22.85M
BEEM:
-$13.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INSG vs. BEEM — Risk / Return Rank
INSG
BEEM
INSG vs. BEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INSG | BEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.06 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | -0.09 | +1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INSG vs. BEEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BEEM drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSG and BEEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSG | BEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -98.50% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.12% | -71.39% | +21.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.31% | -91.05% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.29% | -97.27% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.13% | -98.50% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.55% | -98.12% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.26% | -75.78% | -20.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.38% | 47.02% | -19.64% |
Volatility
INSG vs. BEEM - Volatility Comparison
Inseego Corp. (INSG) has a higher volatility of 27.52% compared to Beam Global (BEEM) at 21.17%. This indicates that INSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INSG | BEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.52% | 21.17% | +6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.75% | 58.35% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.93% | 98.13% | -21.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.80% | 84.57% | +10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.93% | 89.69% | -5.76% |
Dividends
INSG vs. BEEM - Dividend Comparison
Neither INSG nor BEEM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
INSG vs. BEEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inseego Corp. and Beam Global. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INSG vs. BEEM - Profitability Comparison
INSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inseego Corp. reported a gross profit of 16.60M and revenue of 34.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
BEEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Beam Global reported a gross profit of 1.61M and revenue of 9.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.
INSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inseego Corp. reported an operating income of -3.57M and revenue of 34.34M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.4%.
BEEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Beam Global reported an operating income of -2.65M and revenue of 9.05M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.3%.
INSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inseego Corp. reported a net income of 10.56M and revenue of 34.34M, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
BEEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Beam Global reported a net income of -2.33M and revenue of 9.05M, resulting in a net margin of -25.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INSG and BEEM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INSG has higher volatility (27.52%) compared to BEEM (21.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSG dropped -99.92% vs BEEM's -98.50%.
INSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INSG and BEEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer