INSG vs. BEEM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM).

Performance

INSG vs. BEEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INSG vs. BEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INSG Inseego Corp.	8.28%	0.10%	366.79%	-73.91%	-85.55%	-62.31%	111.05%	76.63%	157.76%	-34.02%
BEEM Beam Global	-2.00%	-52.68%	-55.29%	-59.42%	-6.08%	-74.79%	1,483.26%	-52.21%	30.00%	4.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap INSG : $168.82M BEEM : $26.01M
EPS INSG : -$0.01 BEEM : -$1.77
PS Ratio INSG : 1.02 BEEM : 0.88
Total Revenue (TTM) INSG : $166.19M BEEM : $27.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) INSG : $71.00M BEEM : $4.14M
EBITDA (TTM) INSG : $10.68M BEEM : -$14.12M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSG achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than BEEM's -2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, INSG has outperformed BEEM with an annualized return of -4.43%, while BEEM has yielded a comparatively lower -15.84% annualized return.

INSG

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: -9.96%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: -25.72%
• 1Y: 36.11%
• 3Y*: 24.06%
• 5Y*: -35.34%
• 10Y*: -4.43%

BEEM

• 1D: 7.30%
• 1M: -9.82%
• YTD: -2.00%
• 6M: -48.96%
• 1Y: -27.94%
• 3Y*: -54.79%
• 5Y*: -48.38%
• 10Y*: -15.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INSG vs. BEEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSG

INSG Risk / Return Rank: 58
INSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
INSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
INSG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
INSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
INSG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BEEM

BEEM Risk / Return Rank: 31
BEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSG vs. BEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INSG	BEEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	-0.29	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	0.20	+1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.02	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	-0.42	+1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.17	-0.67	+1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INSG vs. BEEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSG Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the BEEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSG and BEEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INSG	BEEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51	-0.29	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	-0.58	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	-0.18	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	-0.14	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between INSG and BEEM is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

INSG vs. BEEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither INSG nor BEEM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

INSG vs. BEEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BEEM drawdown of -98.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSG and BEEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	INSG	BEEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-98.17%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.58%	-64.69%	+21.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.29%	-96.85%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.13%	-98.17%	-0.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.52%	-98.01%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-75.49%	-20.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.97%	39.93%	-15.96%

Volatility

INSG vs. BEEM - Volatility Comparison

Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM) have volatilities of 18.22% and 17.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INSG	BEEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.22%	17.76%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.29%	56.01%	-5.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.39%	96.39%	-25.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.10%	84.48%	+8.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.23%	89.33%	-6.10%

Financials

INSG vs. BEEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Inseego Corp. and Beam Global over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

INSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inseego Corp. reported a gross profit of 20.41M and revenue of 48.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

BEEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Beam Global reported a gross profit of -28.00K and revenue of 5.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.5%.

INSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inseego Corp. reported an operating income of 1.31M and revenue of 48.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

BEEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Beam Global reported an operating income of -4.87M and revenue of 5.79M, resulting in an operating margin of -84.2%.

INSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inseego Corp. reported a net income of -455.00K and revenue of 48.40M, resulting in a net margin of -0.9%.

BEEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Beam Global reported a net income of -4.87M and revenue of 5.79M, resulting in a net margin of -84.1%.