PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSG vs. BEEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSG vs. BEEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSG achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly higher than BEEM's -22.00% return. Over the past 10 years, INSG has outperformed BEEM with an annualized return of -5.79%, while BEEM has yielded a comparatively lower -17.49% annualized return.


INSG

1D
1.86%
1M
-21.01%
6M
-16.01%
YTD
-14.70%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
-37.89%
10Y*
-5.79%

BEEM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.74%
6M
-29.09%
YTD
-22.00%
1Y
-28.66%
3Y*
-51.30%
5Y*
-48.94%
10Y*
-17.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSG vs. BEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSG
Inseego Corp.
-14.70%0.10%366.79%-73.91%-85.55%-62.31%111.05%76.63%157.76%-34.02%
BEEM
Beam Global
-22.00%-52.68%-55.29%-59.42%-6.08%-74.79%1,483.26%-52.21%30.00%4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between INSG and BEEM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2010

0.18

The correlation between INSG and BEEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSG:

$142.58M

BEEM:

$21.28M

EPS

INSG:

$0.83

BEEM:

-$1.57

PS Ratio

INSG:

0.81

BEEM:

0.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSG:

$168.85M

BEEM:

$28.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSG:

$64.27M

BEEM:

$3.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

INSG:

$22.85M

BEEM:

-$13.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Inseego Corp.

Beam Global

Return for Risk

INSG vs. BEEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSG
INSG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
INSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
INSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BEEM
BEEM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSG vs. BEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inseego Corp. (INSG) and Beam Global (BEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INSGBEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.01

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

-0.43

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

-0.61

+0.91

INSG vs. BEEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSG Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the BEEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSG and BEEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INSG vs. BEEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BEEM drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSG and BEEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSGBEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.92%

-98.50%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.68%

-71.39%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.31%

-91.05%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.05%

-97.15%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.13%

-98.50%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.62%

-98.41%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.27%

-75.86%

-20.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.67%

49.45%

-19.78%

Volatility

INSG vs. BEEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inseego Corp. (INSG) is 17.91%, while Beam Global (BEEM) has a volatility of 21.13%. This indicates that INSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSGBEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.91%

21.13%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.00%

58.01%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.05%

96.28%

-19.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.93%

84.33%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.91%

89.56%

-5.65%

Dividends

INSG vs. BEEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither INSG nor BEEM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INSG vs. BEEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inseego Corp. and Beam Global. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
34.34M
9.05M
(INSG) Total Revenue
(BEEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INSG vs. BEEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Inseego Corp. and Beam Global over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
48.3%
17.8%
Portfolio components
INSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Inseego Corp. reported a gross profit of 16.60M and revenue of 34.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

BEEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Beam Global reported a gross profit of 1.61M and revenue of 9.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

INSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Inseego Corp. reported an operating income of -3.57M and revenue of 34.34M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.4%.

BEEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Beam Global reported an operating income of -2.65M and revenue of 9.05M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.3%.

INSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Inseego Corp. reported a net income of 10.56M and revenue of 34.34M, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

BEEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Beam Global reported a net income of -2.33M and revenue of 9.05M, resulting in a net margin of -25.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INSG and BEEM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEEM has higher volatility (21.13%) compared to INSG (17.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSG dropped -99.92% vs BEEM's -98.50%.

INSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSG and BEEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer