INPFX vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
INPFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INPFX or AOM.
Correlation
The correlation between INPFX and AOM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
INPFX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
INPFX:
1.62
AOM:
1.46
INPFX:
2.19
AOM:
2.08
INPFX:
1.30
AOM:
1.27
INPFX:
2.12
AOM:
1.82
INPFX:
7.99
AOM:
7.55
INPFX:
1.26%
AOM:
1.24%
INPFX:
6.19%
AOM:
6.40%
INPFX:
-21.31%
AOM:
-19.96%
INPFX:
-1.02%
AOM:
-0.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INPFX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's 1.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INPFX having a 4.82% annualized return and AOM not far behind at 4.80%.
INPFX
2.51%
2.51%
4.00%
9.77%
4.46%
4.82%
AOM
1.47%
1.47%
3.62%
8.80%
4.33%
4.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INPFX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INPFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INPFX vs. AOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
INPFX
AOM
INPFX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INPFX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
INPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than AOM's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 | 3.79% | 3.89% | 3.86% | 3.37% | 2.59% | 3.48% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 2.81% | 3.11% | 5.63% | 6.92% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.05% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
INPFX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INPFX drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPFX and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INPFX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) is 1.80%, while iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) has a volatility of 2.06%. This indicates that INPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.