INMD vs. CRT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about InMode Ltd. (INMD) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).

Performance

INMD vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InMode Ltd. (INMD) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INMD vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
INMD InMode Ltd.	-6.74%	-12.04%	-24.91%	-37.70%	-49.42%	197.30%	21.12%	188.87%
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	34.47%	-13.15%	-39.15%	-24.36%	145.90%	53.31%	5.38%	-7.33%

Fundamentals

EPS INMD : $1.47 CRT : $0.74
PE Ratio INMD : 9.32 CRT : 14.29
PS Ratio INMD : 2.36 CRT : 11.35
Total Revenue (TTM) INMD : $370.50M CRT : $5.60M
Gross Profit (TTM) INMD : $290.97M CRT : $5.53M
EBITDA (TTM) INMD : $104.17M CRT : $4.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INMD achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 34.47% return.

INMD

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -6.74%
• 6M: -10.34%
• 1Y: -24.31%
• 3Y*: -24.60%
• 5Y*: -18.43%
• 10Y*: —

CRT

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 17.81%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 6M: 47.04%
• 1Y: -8.18%
• 3Y*: -10.70%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INMD vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INMD

INMD Risk / Return Rank: 16
INMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
INMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
INMD Omega Ratio Rank: 16
INMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
INMD Martin Ratio Rank: 19

CRT

CRT Risk / Return Rank: 29
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INMD vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InMode Ltd. (INMD) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INMD	CRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	-0.24	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.67	-0.11	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.99	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.35	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	-0.55	-0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INMD vs. CRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INMD and CRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INMD	CRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.61	-0.24	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	0.27	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.24	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between INMD and CRT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

INMD vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

INMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INMD InMode Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust	5.05%	9.41%	9.56%	10.96%	7.69%	9.71%	9.45%	10.04%	13.06%	6.87%	5.90%	10.41%

Drawdowns

INMD vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INMD drawdown since its inception was -86.96%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMD and CRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INMD	CRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.96%	-83.57%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.03%	-38.87%	+9.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.96%	-71.10%	-15.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.00%	-55.09%	-30.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.20%	-29.27%	-25.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.93%	26.08%	-6.15%

Volatility

INMD vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InMode Ltd. (INMD) is 8.98%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that INMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INMD	CRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.98%	12.52%	-3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.22%	25.05%	+1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.03%	34.93%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.80%	50.51%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.62%	46.12%	+15.50%

Financials

INMD vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InMode Ltd. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

INMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a gross profit of 81.30M and revenue of 103.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 717.33K and revenue of 774.28K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.7%.

INMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InMode Ltd. reported an operating income of 25.99M and revenue of 103.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 440.59K and revenue of 774.28K, resulting in an operating margin of 56.9%.

INMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a net income of 27.03M and revenue of 103.85M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 453.32K and revenue of 774.28K, resulting in a net margin of 58.6%.