PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INGR vs. WPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INGR vs. WPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than WPC's 15.91% return. Over the past 10 years, INGR has underperformed WPC with an annualized return of 0.92%, while WPC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return.


INGR

1D
-0.22%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
-7.13%
6M
-5.98%
1Y
-25.09%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
0.92%

WPC

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.59%
YTD
15.91%
6M
13.63%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INGR vs. WPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
-7.13%-17.86%29.22%14.08%4.47%26.35%-12.55%4.70%-33.10%13.87%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
15.91%24.99%-10.59%-7.93%0.47%22.88%-5.99%28.84%1.08%25.68%

Correlation

The correlation between INGR and WPC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1998

0.23

Fundamentals

EPS

INGR:

$13.96

WPC:

$2.34

PE Ratio

INGR:

7.23

WPC:

31.49

PEG Ratio

INGR:

0.08

WPC:

16.83

PS Ratio

INGR:

0.91

WPC:

10.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

INGR:

$5.41B

WPC:

$1.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INGR:

$1.36B

WPC:

$942.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

INGR:

$902.00M

WPC:

$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INGR vs. WPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INGR
INGR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INGR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INGR Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

WPC
WPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INGR vs. WPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INGRWPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.27

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

2.60

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

7.92

-9.55

INGR vs. WPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INGR Sharpe Ratio is -1.54, which is lower than the WPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INGR and WPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INGRWPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.54

1.57

-3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.27

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.31

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Drawdowns

INGR vs. WPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, which is greater than WPC's maximum drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and WPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INGRWPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-52.45%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-9.71%

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.62%

-27.07%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.62%

-36.81%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-52.45%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.24%

-1.91%

-30.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-10.27%

-8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.45%

3.17%

+12.28%

Volatility

INGR vs. WPC - Volatility Comparison

Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to W. P. Carey Inc. (WPC) at 4.03%. This indicates that INGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INGRWPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

4.03%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

12.06%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

16.08%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

20.63%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.88%

25.79%

-0.91%

Dividends

INGR vs. WPC - Dividend Comparison

INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than WPC's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
3.23%2.92%1.72%2.75%2.78%2.67%3.23%2.70%2.68%1.57%1.52%1.82%
WPC
W. P. Carey Inc.
4.97%5.62%6.41%7.93%5.43%5.12%5.91%5.17%6.26%7.26%6.65%6.48%

Financials

INGR vs. WPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingredion Incorporated and W. P. Carey Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2022202320242025202600
(INGR) Total Revenue
(WPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INGR and WPC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INGR has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to WPC (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INGR dropped -64.20% vs WPC's -52.45%.

WPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INGR and WPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer