INCM vs. PFF
INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) and PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCM is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while PFF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index. INCM is actively managed, while PFF is passively managed. Over the past year, INCM returned 16.64% vs 10.56% for PFF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for PFF.
Performance
INCM vs. PFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCM achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than PFF's 3.62% return.
INCM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 10.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 3.37%
INCM vs. PFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 6.96% | 13.07% | 6.80% | 5.76% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 3.62% | 4.87% | 7.24% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCM and PFF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between INCM and PFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
INCM vs. PFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCM
PFF
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
INCM
PFF
Consumer Defensive
INCM
PFF
Utilities
INCM
PFF
Energy
INCM
PFF
Healthcare
INCM
PFF
Technology
INCM
PFF
Industrials
INCM
PFF
Basic Materials
INCM
PFF
Communication Services
INCM
PFF
Consumer Cyclical
INCM
PFF
Real Estate
INCM
PFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCM vs. PFF — Risk / Return Rank
INCM
PFF
INCM vs. PFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCM | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.20 | 1.58 | +1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.78 | 2.28 | +2.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.27 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 1.99 | +3.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.29 | 6.18 | +16.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCM | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 1.58 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.21 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
INCM vs. PFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum PFF drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and PFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCM | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -65.55% | +57.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -5.28% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.45% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -5.77% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 1.70% | -0.95% |
Volatility
INCM vs. PFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) is 1.72%, while iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that INCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCM | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 2.03% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.81% | 5.06% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22% | 6.72% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 10.30% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 12.66% | -5.43% |
INCM vs. PFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PFF's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCM vs. PFF - Dividend Comparison
INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than PFF's 5.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.06% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 5.43% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCM and PFF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFF has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to INCM (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs PFF's -65.55%.
On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 16.64% vs 10.56% for PFF. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 16.64% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.
PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.43%, compared with 5.06% for INCM.
INCM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while PFF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 0.46% for PFF.
INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCM and PFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer