PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCM vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCM vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INCM having a 7.65% return and JEPQ slightly lower at 7.51%.


INCM

1D
0.41%
1M
0.81%
6M
3.80%
YTD
7.65%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.62%

JEPQ

1D
1.38%
1M
-0.56%
6M
4.41%
YTD
7.51%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.73M$12.25M$11.49M
$489.18M$434.68M$428.59M

INCM vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
7.65%13.07%6.80%5.76%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.51%15.18%24.85%12.71%

Correlation

The correlation between INCM and JEPQ is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCM vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INCM vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INCMJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.28

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.42

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.73

9.91

+7.82

INCM vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCM Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCM and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INCM vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCMJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-20.07%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-8.82%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.84%

-20.07%

+12.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.91%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.07%

-3.38%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

2.15%

-1.36%

Volatility

INCM vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) is 1.48%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that INCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCMJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

6.14%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

12.20%

-7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.50%

14.64%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

16.90%

-9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.21%

16.90%

-9.69%

INCM vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

INCM vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than JEPQ's 11.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.18%4.96%5.06%3.01%0.00%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
11.18%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCM and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEPQ has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to INCM (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 18.60% vs 11.04% for INCM. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.18%, compared with 5.18% for INCM.

INCM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 0.35% for JEPQ.

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCM and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer