IMTM vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
IMTM and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMTM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ex USA Momentum. It was launched on Jan 13, 2015. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both IMTM and FNDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMTM or FNDF.
Correlation
The correlation between IMTM and FNDF is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IMTM vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IMTM:
0.73
FNDF:
0.54
IMTM:
1.11
FNDF:
0.92
IMTM:
1.15
FNDF:
1.12
IMTM:
1.17
FNDF:
0.71
IMTM:
3.42
FNDF:
2.09
IMTM:
4.25%
FNDF:
4.71%
IMTM:
19.85%
FNDF:
17.16%
IMTM:
-30.68%
FNDF:
-40.14%
IMTM:
-0.21%
FNDF:
-0.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has outperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 7.53%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.
IMTM
15.11%
11.33%
12.16%
14.40%
11.52%
7.53%
FNDF
13.70%
9.13%
9.51%
9.28%
15.11%
6.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMTM vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMTM vs. FNDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IMTM
FNDF
IMTM vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMTM vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FNDF's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 2.55% | 2.93% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 5.41% | 0.97% | 2.13% | 2.36% | 1.91% | 2.75% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.53% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
IMTM vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMTM vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.