IMOM vs. FLJP
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP).
IMOM and FLJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMOM is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). It was launched on Dec 23, 2015. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both IMOM and FLJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMOM or FLJP.
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and FLJP is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IMOM vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IMOM:
0.30
FLJP:
0.31
IMOM:
0.51
FLJP:
0.53
IMOM:
1.07
FLJP:
1.07
IMOM:
0.18
FLJP:
0.46
IMOM:
1.11
FLJP:
1.12
IMOM:
4.52%
FLJP:
4.73%
IMOM:
16.61%
FLJP:
17.18%
IMOM:
-45.74%
FLJP:
-32.49%
IMOM:
-16.65%
FLJP:
-5.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than FLJP's 1.01% return.
IMOM
3.35%
2.89%
3.64%
5.62%
3.17%
N/A
FLJP
1.01%
0.17%
0.25%
6.29%
5.04%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMOM vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMOM vs. FLJP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IMOM
FLJP
IMOM vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMOM vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than FLJP's 4.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 4.37% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.01% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.51% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.91% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than FLJP's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and FLJP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMOM vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) is 3.81%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that IMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.