PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMO vs. CNR.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IMOCNR.TO
YTD Return29.89%-5.20%
1Y Return31.85%2.15%
3Y Return (Ann)31.17%0.41%
5Y Return (Ann)27.53%6.73%
10Y Return (Ann)6.65%8.78%
Sharpe Ratio1.280.18
Sortino Ratio1.810.36
Omega Ratio1.221.04
Calmar Ratio2.330.19
Martin Ratio5.840.39
Ulcer Index5.73%7.63%
Daily Std Dev26.23%16.51%
Max Drawdown-84.96%-37.85%
Current Drawdown-8.03%-12.54%

Fundamentals


IMOCNR.TO
Market Cap$38.17BCA$97.80B
EPS$6.55CA$8.45
PE Ratio11.1218.41
PEG Ratio0.853.30
Total Revenue (TTM)$55.46BCA$18.64B
Gross Profit (TTM)$20.33BCA$7.96B
EBITDA (TTM)$8.60BCA$6.80B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between IMO and CNR.TO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 29.89% return, which is significantly higher than CNR.TO's -5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has underperformed CNR.TO with an annualized return of 6.65%, while CNR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.57%
-10.18%
IMO
CNR.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMO, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IMO, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMO, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IMO, currently valued at 5.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.12
CNR.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNR.TO, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNR.TO, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNR.TO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNR.TO, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNR.TO, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.15

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the CNR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and CNR.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.15
-0.07
IMO
CNR.TO

Dividends

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than CNR.TO's 2.14% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
2.32%2.50%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.39%1.55%1.39%1.29%1.70%1.06%
CNR.TO
Canadian National Railway Company
2.14%1.90%1.82%1.58%1.64%1.83%1.80%1.59%1.66%1.62%1.25%1.42%

Drawdowns

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than CNR.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and CNR.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.03%
-15.13%
IMO
CNR.TO

Volatility

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to Canadian National Railway Company (CNR.TO) at 5.00%. This indicates that IMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.65%
5.00%
IMO
CNR.TO

Financials

IMO vs. CNR.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Canadian National Railway Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. IMO values in USD, CNR.TO values in CAD