IMO.TO vs. CVE
Compare and contrast key facts about Imperial Oil Limited (IMO.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMO.TO or CVE.
Key characteristics
| IMO.TO | CVE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 28.74% | 27.44% |
| 1Y Return | 37.95% | 23.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 49.10% | 43.80% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 22.92% | 17.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.57% | -1.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.50 | 0.73 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.54% | 29.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -78.70% | -95.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.46% | -30.65% |
Fundamentals
| IMO.TO | CVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$51.24B | $38.92B |
| EPS | CA$8.49 | $1.54 |
| PE Ratio | 11.26 | 13.54 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.53 | 0.45 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$50.70B | $52.20B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$12.09B | $16.00B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$8.08B | $9.91B |
Correlation
The correlation between IMO.TO and CVE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IMO.TO vs. CVE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IMO.TO having a 28.74% return and CVE slightly lower at 27.44%. Over the past 10 years, IMO.TO has outperformed CVE with an annualized return of 8.57%, while CVE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMO.TO vs. CVE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO.TO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMO.TO vs. CVE - Dividend Comparison
IMO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than CVE's 1.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMO.TO Imperial Oil Limited | 1.61% | 1.90% | 1.70% | 1.81% | 2.76% | 1.86% | 1.62% | 1.25% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc. | 1.98% | 2.34% | 1.81% | 0.56% | 0.74% | 1.57% | 2.16% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 5.22% | 4.62% | 3.25% |
Drawdowns
IMO.TO vs. CVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, smaller than the maximum CVE drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO.TO and CVE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMO.TO vs. CVE - Volatility Comparison
Imperial Oil Limited (IMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) at 5.97%. This indicates that IMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IMO.TO vs. CVE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities