PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMKTA vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMKTA vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMKTA achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 7.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IMKTA has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 10.32%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.44% annualized return.


IMKTA

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.69%
YTD
30.42%
6M
26.54%
1Y
41.55%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
10.32%

WMT

1D
1.91%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
7.61%
6M
8.11%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
33.53%
5Y*
22.77%
10Y*
19.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMKTA vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMKTA
Ingles Markets, Incorporated
30.42%7.44%-24.70%-9.77%12.58%104.80%-8.75%78.27%-19.72%-26.73%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
7.61%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IMKTA and WMT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.19

The correlation between IMKTA and WMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

IMKTA:

$7.32

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

IMKTA:

12.17

WMT:

41.48

PS Ratio

IMKTA:

0.24

WMT:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMKTA:

$5.40B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMKTA:

$1.32B

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMKTA:

$279.31M

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMKTA vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMKTA
IMKTA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IMKTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMKTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMKTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IMKTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMKTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMKTA vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMKTAWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.47

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

4.40

+3.54

IMKTA vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMKTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMKTA and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMKTA vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMKTA drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMKTA and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMKTAWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.55%

-77.14%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-15.75%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.98%

-21.93%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.58%

-25.74%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.08%

-25.74%

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.20%

-11.01%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-14.63%

-9.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

5.25%

0.00%

Volatility

IMKTA vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 6.40%. This indicates that IMKTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMKTAWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

6.40%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

18.56%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.59%

23.82%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.34%

21.70%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

21.76%

+10.70%

Dividends

IMKTA vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

IMKTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than WMT's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMKTA
Ingles Markets, Incorporated
0.74%0.96%1.02%0.76%0.68%0.76%1.55%1.39%2.42%1.91%1.37%1.50%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.81%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

IMKTA vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingles Markets, Incorporated and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
1.31B
177.75B
(IMKTA) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IMKTA and WMT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMKTA has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to WMT (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMKTA dropped -72.55% vs WMT's -77.14%.

IMKTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMKTA and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer