IMID.L vs. DIA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).
IMID.L and DIA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMID.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. DIA is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It was launched on Jan 14, 1998. Both IMID.L and DIA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMID.L or DIA.
Key characteristics
IMID.L | DIA | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 13.78% | 11.22% |
1Y Return | 21.53% | 20.67% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.33% | 8.20% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.90% | 10.88% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.73% | 11.58% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.78 | 2.02 |
Daily Std Dev | 12.32% | 10.81% |
Max Drawdown | -39.56% | -51.87% |
Current Drawdown | -0.67% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMID.L and DIA is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IMID.L vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IMID.L achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 11.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IMID.L has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of 8.73%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMID.L vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMID.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMID.L vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMID.L vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
IMID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF | 1.37% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.02% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
IMID.L vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and DIA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMID.L vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) at 2.89%. This indicates that IMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.