IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Europe UCITS Dist (IMEU.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS).
IMEU.L and VWRL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMEU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jul 6, 2007. VWRL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both IMEU.L and VWRL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMEU.L or VWRL.AS.
Key characteristics
IMEU.L | VWRL.AS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 3.33% | 24.37% |
1Y Return | 10.45% | 30.64% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 4.00% | 8.48% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.03% | 11.95% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 7.87% | 10.91% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.95 | 2.88 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.38 | 3.80 |
Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.59 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.48 | 3.73 |
Martin Ratio | 4.34 | 18.23 |
Ulcer Index | 2.17% | 1.65% |
Daily Std Dev | 9.97% | 10.45% |
Max Drawdown | -43.90% | -33.27% |
Current Drawdown | -6.21% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMEU.L and VWRL.AS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IMEU.L achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.AS's 24.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IMEU.L has underperformed VWRL.AS with an annualized return of 7.87%, while VWRL.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMEU.L has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe UCITS Dist (IMEU.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison
IMEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than VWRL.AS's 1.44% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI Europe UCITS Dist | 3.48% | 3.31% | 3.29% | 2.68% | 2.30% | 3.59% | 3.61% | 2.97% | 3.34% | 3.62% | 3.22% | 2.95% |
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.44% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -43.90%, which is greater than VWRL.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMEU.L and VWRL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMEU.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe UCITS Dist (IMEU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) at 3.03%. This indicates that IMEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.