PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.40%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


IMCV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.96%
6M
11.32%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.40%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
9.96%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and VTV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004

0.91

The correlation between IMCV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
VTV

Financial Services

15.6%
22.3%

Energy

12.5%
8.1%

Industrials

12.1%
14.0%

Utilities

10.0%
5.2%

Technology

9.1%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
4.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
14.5%

Basic Materials

6.5%
3.1%

Real Estate

5.6%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.3%

Financial Services

IMCV
15.6%
VTV
22.3%

Energy

IMCV
12.5%
VTV
8.1%

Industrials

IMCV
12.1%
VTV
14.0%

Utilities

IMCV
10.0%
VTV
5.2%

Technology

IMCV
9.1%
VTV
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.9%
VTV
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.7%
VTV
4.0%

Healthcare

IMCV
8.5%
VTV
14.5%

Basic Materials

IMCV
6.5%
VTV
3.1%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.6%
VTV
2.8%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.5%
VTV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMCVVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

4.15

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

15.69

-2.97

IMCV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMCVVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.61

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.81

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.51

-0.04

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-59.27%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-6.35%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-14.52%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-17.04%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-36.78%

-9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-7.87%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.68%

+0.17%

Volatility

IMCV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.52%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

7.55%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

10.11%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

13.88%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

16.67%

+2.99%

IMCV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.94%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IMCV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMCV has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 10.40% for IMCV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer