PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.48%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.91% annualized return.


IMCG

1D
0.83%
1M
4.95%
YTD
18.63%
6M
17.29%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
14.48%

SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.37%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
18.63%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and SCHD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between IMCG and SCHD has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IMCG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCG
SCHD

Technology

30.4%
16.4%

Industrials

26.6%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.3%

Financial Services

9.1%
9.3%

Healthcare

7.4%
18.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.7%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.6%
6.3%

Energy

2.1%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
19.2%

Technology

IMCG
30.4%
SCHD
16.4%

Industrials

IMCG
26.6%
SCHD
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCG
10.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Financial Services

IMCG
9.1%
SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

IMCG
7.4%
SCHD
18.8%

Basic Materials

IMCG
4.5%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

IMCG
3.4%
SCHD

-

Utilities

IMCG
2.7%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

IMCG
2.6%
SCHD
6.3%

Energy

IMCG
2.1%
SCHD
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

IMCG
1.2%
SCHD
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCGSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

5.70

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

13.97

-5.74

IMCG vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCGSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-33.37%

-25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-4.61%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-16.13%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-16.85%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

-33.37%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.03%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-3.31%

-5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.89%

+0.77%

Volatility

IMCG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCGSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

3.05%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

7.53%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

10.93%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

14.38%

+5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

16.72%

+3.86%

IMCG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMCG and SCHD have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.48% vs 12.91% for SCHD. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCG and SCHD have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.66% for IMCG.

IMCG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer