PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMCG vs. NULG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and NULG is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

IMCG vs. NULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%250.00%300.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
175.67%
260.97%
IMCG
NULG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMCG:

0.16

NULG:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

IMCG:

0.32

NULG:

0.38

Omega Ratio

IMCG:

1.04

NULG:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

IMCG:

0.18

NULG:

0.25

Martin Ratio

IMCG:

0.56

NULG:

0.71

Ulcer Index

IMCG:

4.48%

NULG:

5.03%

Daily Std Dev

IMCG:

15.89%

NULG:

19.07%

Max Drawdown

IMCG:

-58.96%

NULG:

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

IMCG:

-11.40%

NULG:

-13.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly higher than NULG's -8.10% return.


IMCG

YTD

-4.66%

1M

-5.80%

6M

-0.31%

1Y

3.29%

5Y*

16.13%

10Y*

10.63%

NULG

YTD

-8.10%

1M

-6.96%

6M

-3.17%

1Y

3.76%

5Y*

20.54%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMCG vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for NULG: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
NULG: 0.25%
Expense ratio chart for IMCG: current value is 0.06%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IMCG: 0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMCG vs. NULG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMCG is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMCG is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMCG is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMCG is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMCG is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMCG is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

NULG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NULG is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NULG is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NULG is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NULG is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NULG is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NULG is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMCG vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
IMCG: 0.16
NULG: 0.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
IMCG: 0.32
NULG: 0.38
The chart of Omega ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
IMCG: 1.04
NULG: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
IMCG: 0.18
NULG: 0.25
The chart of Martin ratio for IMCG, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00
IMCG: 0.56
NULG: 0.71

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is comparable to the NULG Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and NULG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.16
0.19
IMCG
NULG

Dividends

IMCG vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than NULG's 0.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.80%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%0.60%
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.17%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.69%1.10%3.73%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than NULG's maximum drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and NULG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.40%
-13.08%
IMCG
NULG

Volatility

IMCG vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is 7.01%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that IMCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.01%
7.67%
IMCG
NULG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab