IMCB vs. VOE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCB is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while VOE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCB returned 11.25%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for VOE. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IMCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOE.

Performance

IMCB vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCB achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than VOE's 17.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCB having a 11.25% annualized return and VOE not far behind at 10.74%.

IMCB

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 14.82%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 11.25%
• ALL TIME*: 10.44%

VOE

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: 11.78%
• YTD: 17.06%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 10.74%
• ALL TIME*: 9.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	$3.07M	$3.70M	$3.21M
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF	$57.80M	$55.63M	$55.30M

IMCB vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	19.07%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	22.81%	13.35%	31.49%	-11.53%	19.70%
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF	17.06%	12.08%	14.00%	9.85%	-7.97%	28.78%	2.65%	27.85%	-12.48%	17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCB and VOE is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006	0.94

The correlation between IMCB and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCB vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCB	VOE
Industrials	18.4%	13.8%
Technology	17.9%	8.1%
Financial Services	14.1%	18.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	5.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.2%
Energy	7.0%	11.7%
Utilities	6.5%	12.6%
Basic Materials	5.5%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	7.6%
Real Estate	4.5%	5.8%
Communication Services	2.4%	1.5%

Return for Risk

IMCB vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 80
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 85

VOE

VOE Risk / Return Rank: 91
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 90
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCB vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMCB	VOE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.36	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.39	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	3.85	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	14.92	-2.69

IMCB vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCB and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMCB vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, roughly equal to the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and VOE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCB	VOE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.80%	-61.50%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.05%	-6.93%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.80%	-18.45%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	-19.70%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.99%	-43.18%	+2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.92%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-8.29%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.78%	+0.22%

Volatility

IMCB vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) have volatilities of 2.51% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCB	VOE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	2.58%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	8.09%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	11.33%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	15.89%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	18.74%	+0.87%

IMCB vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMCB vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than VOE's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.20%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF	1.81%	2.10%	2.11%	2.27%	2.27%	1.78%	2.36%	2.05%	2.75%	1.86%	1.92%	2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCB and VOE in my portfolio?

IMCB and VOE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCB or VOE?

VOE has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to IMCB (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCB dropped -58.80% vs VOE's -61.50%.

Which ETF is better, IMCB or VOE?

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.25% vs 10.74% for VOE. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCB or VOE?

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.25% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCB or VOE?

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VOE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCB or VOE?

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.20% for IMCB.

What is the main difference between IMCB and VOE?

IMCB is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOE is Mid Cap Value Equities. IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IMCB and 0.05% for VOE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.