IMB.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMB.L or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between IMB.L and VOO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IMB.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IMB.L:
4.20
VOO:
0.52
IMB.L:
5.64
VOO:
0.89
IMB.L:
1.78
VOO:
1.13
IMB.L:
3.41
VOO:
0.57
IMB.L:
41.36
VOO:
2.18
IMB.L:
1.74%
VOO:
4.85%
IMB.L:
17.06%
VOO:
19.11%
IMB.L:
-61.74%
VOO:
-33.99%
IMB.L:
-4.34%
VOO:
-7.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMB.L achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IMB.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.38%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.
IMB.L
20.57%
7.63%
32.78%
72.13%
22.33%
6.38%
VOO
-3.41%
3.92%
-5.06%
9.92%
15.85%
12.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMB.L vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IMB.L
VOO
IMB.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMB.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than VOO's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMB.L Imperial Brands plc | 5.08% | 5.91% | 7.99% | 6.78% | 8.57% | 5.84% | 10.70% | 7.65% | 5.22% | 4.24% | 5.05% | 4.23% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.34% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
IMB.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMB.L drawdown since its inception was -61.74%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMB.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMB.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Imperial Brands plc (IMB.L) is 6.01%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that IMB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.