ILMN vs. PEP

In the year-to-date period, ILMN achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -7.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ILMN has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of -2.69%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.72% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ILMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILMN and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ILMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.

The maximum ILMN drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILMN and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 4.52%. This indicates that ILMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illumina, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.