ILMN vs. BRK-B
ILMN (Illumina, Inc.) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) are both stocks. ILMN operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while BRK-B operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ILMN returned 2.36%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for BRK-B. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILMN achieves a 56.37% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ILMN has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 2.36%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.57% annualized return.
ILMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 41.63%
- YTD
- 56.37%
- 1Y
- 116.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- -15.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.71%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.04B | $2.04B | $2.42B | |
ILMN Illumina, Inc. | $380.44M | $366.37M | $326.09M |
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 56.37% | -1.85% | -1.34% | -31.14% | -46.85% | 2.82% | 11.53% | 10.61% | 37.27% | 70.64% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 1.77% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 3.01% | 21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILMN and BRK-B is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ILMN and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ILMN:
$31.03B
BRK-B:
$1.10T
ILMN:
$3.14
BRK-B:
$33.62
ILMN:
65.26
BRK-B:
15.22
ILMN:
30.63
BRK-B:
0.59
ILMN:
7.03
BRK-B:
2.94
ILMN:
10.10
BRK-B:
1.52
ILMN:
$4.49B
BRK-B:
$375.39B
ILMN:
$3.00B
BRK-B:
$94.36B
ILMN:
$1.20B
BRK-B:
$71.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILMN vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
ILMN
BRK-B
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILMN | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 0.90 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | 1.88 | +7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILMN drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILMN and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILMN | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.14% | -53.86% | -42.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.66% | -9.42% | -16.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.49% | -14.95% | -46.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.23% | -26.58% | -59.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.23% | -29.57% | -56.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.83% | -5.24% | -54.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -11.06% | -29.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | 4.49% | +5.75% |
Volatility
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.59%. This indicates that ILMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILMN | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 4.59% | +6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.48% | 11.13% | +19.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.88% | 14.79% | +33.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.02% | 17.12% | +28.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.22% | 19.42% | +22.80% |
Dividends
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither ILMN nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illumina, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ILMN vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison
ILMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Illumina, Inc. reported a gross profit of 770.00M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
BRK-B - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.
ILMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Illumina, Inc. reported an operating income of 245.00M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
BRK-B - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
ILMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Illumina, Inc. reported a net income of -134.00M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of -11.6%.
BRK-B - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ILMN and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILMN has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to BRK-B (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILMN dropped -96.14% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
ILMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILMN and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer