ILIT vs. SQM
ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net, while SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) is a stock. Over the past year, ILIT returned 181.76% vs 158.32% for SQM. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ILIT vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's 15.51% return.
ILIT
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- -12.04%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 35.19%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQM
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -11.45%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 26.25%
- 1Y
- 158.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 16.20%
- 10Y*
- 17.70%
ILIT vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 25.82% | 81.51% | -45.14% | -28.86% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 15.51% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILIT and SQM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ILIT and SQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILIT vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
ILIT
SQM
ILIT vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.00 | 8.18 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.21 | 21.01 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74 | 3.16 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.42 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
ILIT vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and SQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.69% | -78.34% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.86% | -19.47% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | -19.84% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.87% | -30.33% | -15.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.22% | 7.57% | +0.65% |
Volatility
ILIT vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) have volatilities of 11.95% and 11.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILIT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 11.83% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.28% | 35.12% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.97% | 50.42% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.58% | 49.65% | -8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.58% | 46.05% | -4.47% |
Dividends
ILIT vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than SQM's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | 1.81% | 2.27% | 6.48% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.47% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILIT and SQM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILIT has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to SQM (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILIT dropped -73.69% vs SQM's -78.34%.
ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILIT and SQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer