ILF vs. FFRHX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX).
ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. FFRHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 16, 2000.
Performance
ILF vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILF vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 16.65% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -6.85% | 26.33% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.61% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ILF has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.
ILF
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
FFRHX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILF vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILF vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
ILF
FFRHX
ILF vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILF | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 1.51 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 2.14 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 1.71 | +2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.54 | 8.28 | +7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILF | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.51 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.84 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 1.21 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.13 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILF and FFRHX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ILF vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than FFRHX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.76% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.75% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
Drawdowns
ILF vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and FFRHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILF | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.48% | -22.20% | -45.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -2.74% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -5.90% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.79% | -22.20% | -35.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -0.83% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -1.16% | -22.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 0.59% | +3.06% |
Volatility
ILF vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.66%. This indicates that ILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILF | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 0.66% | +10.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 1.61% | +16.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 3.32% | +20.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 2.84% | +20.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 4.13% | +24.46% |