PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ILCV vs. CLU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and CLU.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

ILCV vs. CLU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%350.00%400.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
348.82%
267.61%
ILCV
CLU.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ILCV:

-0.08

CLU.TO:

-0.19

Sortino Ratio

ILCV:

-0.02

CLU.TO:

-0.16

Omega Ratio

ILCV:

1.00

CLU.TO:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

ILCV:

-0.08

CLU.TO:

-0.18

Martin Ratio

ILCV:

-0.43

CLU.TO:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

ILCV:

2.49%

CLU.TO:

2.95%

Daily Std Dev

ILCV:

13.24%

CLU.TO:

13.42%

Max Drawdown

ILCV:

-58.63%

CLU.TO:

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

ILCV:

-13.00%

CLU.TO:

-14.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly higher than CLU.TO's -8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCV has outperformed CLU.TO with an annualized return of 8.60%, while CLU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.54% annualized return.


ILCV

YTD

-8.42%

1M

-10.60%

6M

-9.27%

1Y

0.00%

5Y*

14.44%

10Y*

8.60%

CLU.TO

YTD

-8.94%

1M

-10.20%

6M

-9.55%

1Y

-2.58%

5Y*

16.06%

10Y*

6.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILCV vs. CLU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CLU.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.


CLU.TO
iShares US Fundamental Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLU.TO: current value is 0.72%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CLU.TO: 0.72%
Expense ratio chart for ILCV: current value is 0.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ILCV: 0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ILCV vs. CLU.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILCV is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILCV is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILCV is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILCV is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILCV is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILCV is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CLU.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLU.TO is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLU.TO is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ILCV vs. CLU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ILCV, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
ILCV: 0.02
CLU.TO: -0.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for ILCV, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
ILCV: 0.10
CLU.TO: -0.41
The chart of Omega ratio for ILCV, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
ILCV: 1.02
CLU.TO: 0.94
The chart of Calmar ratio for ILCV, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
ILCV: 0.02
CLU.TO: -0.38
The chart of Martin ratio for ILCV, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00
ILCV: 0.09
CLU.TO: -1.42

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the CLU.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and CLU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.02
-0.39
ILCV
CLU.TO

Dividends

ILCV vs. CLU.TO - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than CLU.TO's 1.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
2.23%2.00%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%2.44%
CLU.TO
iShares US Fundamental Index ETF
1.48%1.32%1.35%1.63%0.82%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. CLU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than CLU.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and CLU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.00%
-15.44%
ILCV
CLU.TO

Volatility

ILCV vs. CLU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 8.40%, while iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.TO) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.40%
8.95%
ILCV
CLU.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab