PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ILCG vs. VONG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ILCG and VONG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

ILCG vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.31%
8.54%
ILCG
VONG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ILCG:

1.12

VONG:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

ILCG:

1.55

VONG:

1.60

Omega Ratio

ILCG:

1.21

VONG:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

ILCG:

1.58

VONG:

1.56

Martin Ratio

ILCG:

6.05

VONG:

5.83

Ulcer Index

ILCG:

3.35%

VONG:

3.50%

Daily Std Dev

ILCG:

18.06%

VONG:

17.62%

Max Drawdown

ILCG:

-52.98%

VONG:

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

ILCG:

-6.03%

VONG:

-5.22%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ILCG having a -1.17% return and VONG slightly lower at -1.20%. Over the past 10 years, ILCG has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.79%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.


ILCG

YTD

-1.17%

1M

-5.66%

6M

8.31%

1Y

20.58%

5Y*

17.38%

10Y*

14.79%

VONG

YTD

-1.20%

1M

-4.59%

6M

8.54%

1Y

20.81%

5Y*

19.80%

10Y*

16.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILCG vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for VONG: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%
Expense ratio chart for ILCG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ILCG vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILCG is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILCG is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILCG is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILCG is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILCG is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILCG is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VONG is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VONG is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VONG is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VONG is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VONG is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VONG is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ILCG vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ILCG, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.121.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for ILCG, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.551.60
The chart of Omega ratio for ILCG, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.211.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for ILCG, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.581.56
The chart of Martin ratio for ILCG, currently valued at 6.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.055.83
ILCG
VONG

The current ILCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCG and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.12
1.16
ILCG
VONG

Dividends

ILCG vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than VONG's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.50%0.50%0.69%0.76%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%0.87%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.56%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%1.43%

Drawdowns

ILCG vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.03%
-5.22%
ILCG
VONG

Volatility

ILCG vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.56%
5.31%
ILCG
VONG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab