ILCG vs. IWP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP).
ILCG and IWP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. IWP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. Both ILCG and IWP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ILCG or IWP.
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and IWP is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ILCG vs. IWP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ILCG:
2.07
IWP:
1.59
ILCG:
2.68
IWP:
2.18
ILCG:
1.38
IWP:
1.28
ILCG:
2.83
IWP:
1.48
ILCG:
11.41
IWP:
8.20
ILCG:
3.18%
IWP:
3.11%
ILCG:
17.57%
IWP:
16.02%
ILCG:
-52.98%
IWP:
-56.92%
ILCG:
-1.91%
IWP:
-6.41%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 36.10% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 24.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCG has outperformed IWP with an annualized return of 15.73%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.
ILCG
36.10%
2.98%
14.45%
36.38%
17.61%
15.73%
IWP
24.52%
-3.52%
17.49%
24.82%
11.71%
11.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILCG vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWP's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ILCG vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ILCG vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than IWP's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.87% | 0.94% |
IWP iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and IWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ILCG vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) is 5.23%, while iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that ILCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.