ILCG vs. IWP
ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCG returned 17.76%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for IWP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.
Performance
ILCG vs. IWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCG has outperformed IWP with an annualized return of 17.76%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.
ILCG
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 23.18%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- 17.76%
IWP
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
ILCG vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.80% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 24.33% | 38.56% | 33.22% | 2.06% | 30.57% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 2.12% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 35.04% | -4.89% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and IWP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ILCG and IWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ILCG vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCG
IWP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ILCG
IWP
Communication Services
ILCG
IWP
Consumer Cyclical
ILCG
IWP
Industrials
ILCG
IWP
Financial Services
ILCG
IWP
Healthcare
ILCG
IWP
Consumer Defensive
ILCG
IWP
Real Estate
ILCG
IWP
Basic Materials
ILCG
IWP
Utilities
ILCG
IWP
Energy
ILCG
IWP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCG vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank
ILCG
IWP
ILCG vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCG | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.05 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 0.26 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 0.74 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCG | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.23 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.26 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.57 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and IWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCG | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.98% | -56.92% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -14.79% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -25.20% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.38% | -38.62% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -38.62% | +3.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -3.65% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -9.68% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 5.08% | -0.62% |
Volatility
ILCG vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) at 4.58%. This indicates that ILCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCG | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 4.58% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 12.94% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 16.68% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 22.34% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 21.69% | -0.12% |
ILCG vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCG vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCG and IWP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILCG has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to IWP (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCG dropped -52.98% vs IWP's -56.92%.
On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 17.76% vs 12.27% for IWP. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IWP has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 17.76% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWP.
ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
ILCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.23% for IWP.
ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCG and IWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer