ILCB vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
ILCB and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILCB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both ILCB and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ILCB or XLG.
Key characteristics
| ILCB | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.94% | 32.51% |
| 1Y Return | 38.29% | 40.53% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.45% | 12.34% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.02% | 18.78% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.59% | 15.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.08 | 2.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.10 | 3.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.58 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.38 | 3.57 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.90 | 14.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.91% | 2.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.35% | 14.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -52.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.99% | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCB and XLG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ILCB vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ILCB achieves a 26.94% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 32.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 12.59%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILCB vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ILCB vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ILCB vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than XLG's 0.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 1.18% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% | 1.86% | 1.89% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
ILCB vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ILCB vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) is 3.87%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that ILCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.