PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 11.60%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.02% annualized return.


IJT

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
21.22%
6M
17.80%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
11.60%

VUG

1D
-2.12%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
3.52%
6M
2.23%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
18.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
21.22%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
3.52%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and VUG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between IJT and VUG has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IJT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJT
VUG

Technology

21.2%
53.5%

Industrials

18.7%
3.6%

Healthcare

14.7%
4.6%

Financial Services

13.5%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.2%

Real Estate

6.5%
1.0%

Energy

3.8%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.6%

Communication Services

2.9%
17.3%

Utilities

1.7%
0.9%

Technology

IJT
21.2%
VUG
53.5%

Industrials

IJT
18.7%
VUG
3.6%

Healthcare

IJT
14.7%
VUG
4.6%

Financial Services

IJT
13.5%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IJT
10.7%
VUG
12.2%

Real Estate

IJT
6.5%
VUG
1.0%

Energy

IJT
3.8%
VUG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

IJT
3.3%
VUG
1.5%

Basic Materials

IJT
3.0%
VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

IJT
2.9%
VUG
17.3%

Utilities

IJT
1.7%
VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJTVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

1.22

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

4.15

+8.08

IJT vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-50.68%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-16.53%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-22.85%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-35.61%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-35.61%

-6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-6.88%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-7.09%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

4.84%

-2.25%

Volatility

IJT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) is 5.32%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that IJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

6.86%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

13.44%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

16.91%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

22.39%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

21.51%

+1.51%

IJT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.71%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJT and VUG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to IJT (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.02% vs 11.60% for IJT. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.02% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.03% for VUG.

IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer