IJT vs. VUG
IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJT is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJT returned 10.80%/yr vs 18.40%/yr for VUG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
IJT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 10.80%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.40% annualized return.
IJT
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
VUG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
IJT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 16.04% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 10.86% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJT and VUG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IJT and VUG has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IJT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJT
VUG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
IJT
VUG
Industrials
IJT
VUG
Healthcare
IJT
VUG
Financial Services
IJT
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
IJT
VUG
Real Estate
IJT
VUG
Energy
IJT
VUG
Basic Materials
IJT
VUG
Consumer Defensive
IJT
VUG
Communication Services
IJT
VUG
Utilities
IJT
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
IJT
VUG
IJT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.93 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.60 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 1.90 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 6.65 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.93 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.71 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.86 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.62 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
IJT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.61% | -50.68% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -16.53% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | -22.85% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -35.61% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.03% | -35.61% | -6.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.28% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -7.09% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 4.71% | -2.10% |
Volatility
IJT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.52%. This indicates that IJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 3.52% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 12.05% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 15.80% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 22.22% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 21.44% | +1.59% |
IJT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJT and VUG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJT has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VUG (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.40% vs 10.80% for IJT. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.40% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.
IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJT and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer