IJS vs. VT
IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJS returned 10.20%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for VT. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
IJS vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.20%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.
IJS
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 41.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
VT
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
IJS vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 16.54% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 13.23% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJS and VT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IJS and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJS vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJS
VT
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJS
VT
Consumer Cyclical
IJS
VT
Industrials
IJS
VT
Technology
IJS
VT
Real Estate
IJS
VT
Energy
IJS
VT
Healthcare
IJS
VT
Basic Materials
IJS
VT
Communication Services
IJS
VT
Consumer Defensive
IJS
VT
Utilities
IJS
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJS vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
IJS
VT
IJS vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 2.44 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 3.36 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 3.27 | +1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 14.59 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.44 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.71 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.75 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
IJS vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -50.27% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -9.67% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -16.51% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -26.38% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.68% | -34.24% | -13.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -7.02% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.17% | +0.66% |
Volatility
IJS vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.75%. This indicates that IJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.75% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | 10.13% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 12.67% | +5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 16.04% | +5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 17.23% | +6.37% |
IJS vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJS vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than VT's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJS and VT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJS has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to VT (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.84% vs 10.20% for IJS. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.28% for IJS.
IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJS and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer