PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJK vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJK vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than VBK's 12.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJK having a 10.87% annualized return and VBK not far ahead at 10.90%.


IJK

1D
-0.07%
1M
-2.82%
6M
11.34%
YTD
15.74%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
8.48%

VBK

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.86%
6M
9.06%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.18M$22.70M$31.50M
$67.40M$71.27M$83.02M

IJK vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
15.74%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.94%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and VBK is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.95

The correlation between IJK and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJK vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJK
VBK

Industrials

30.8%
23.4%

Technology

23.9%
27.1%

Healthcare

13.6%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
8.9%

Financial Services

6.7%
5.7%

Real Estate

5.2%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.1%

Energy

3.0%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.6%

Utilities

1.8%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
2.0%

Industrials

IJK
30.8%
VBK
23.4%

Technology

IJK
23.9%
VBK
27.1%

Healthcare

IJK
13.6%
VBK
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IJK
7.3%
VBK
8.9%

Financial Services

IJK
6.7%
VBK
5.7%

Real Estate

IJK
5.2%
VBK
3.7%

Basic Materials

IJK
4.1%
VBK
3.1%

Energy

IJK
3.0%
VBK
3.4%

Communication Services

IJK
2.2%
VBK
3.6%

Utilities

IJK
1.8%
VBK
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

IJK
1.6%
VBK
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJK vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJK vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJKVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.86

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

6.29

+1.46

IJK vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJK vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJKVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-58.68%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-11.44%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-27.54%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-38.39%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-38.70%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-6.90%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-10.10%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.37%

-0.65%

Volatility

IJK vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is 4.51%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that IJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJKVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

5.16%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

15.93%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

20.39%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

23.65%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

22.91%

-1.83%

IJK vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJK vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than VBK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IJK and VBK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to IJK (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 10.90% vs 10.87% for IJK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJK has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.05% for VBK.

IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJK and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer