PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJH vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJH vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 11.27%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.


IJH

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.84%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.33%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
11.27%

VOT

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.62%
YTD
8.39%
6M
6.44%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.10%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
8.39%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and VOT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.90

The correlation between IJH and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJH vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJH
VOT

Industrials

25.0%
23.7%

Technology

15.7%
28.9%

Financial Services

14.4%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
13.9%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.3%

Real Estate

7.5%
4.8%

Energy

5.5%
2.7%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
0.8%

Utilities

3.1%
3.5%

Communication Services

1.0%
3.8%

Industrials

IJH
25.0%
VOT
23.7%

Technology

IJH
15.7%
VOT
28.9%

Financial Services

IJH
14.4%
VOT
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.7%
VOT
13.9%

Healthcare

IJH
8.6%
VOT
9.3%

Real Estate

IJH
7.5%
VOT
4.8%

Energy

IJH
5.5%
VOT
2.7%

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
VOT
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.8%
VOT
0.8%

Utilities

IJH
3.1%
VOT
3.5%

Communication Services

IJH
1.0%
VOT
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJH vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJHVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

0.72

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

2.14

+8.46

IJH vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJHVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.72

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.32

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Drawdowns

IJH vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJHVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-60.16%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-15.96%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-21.77%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-37.19%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-37.19%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.83%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-9.96%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

5.32%

-2.91%

Volatility

IJH vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJHVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.37%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

12.36%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

15.81%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

21.36%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

20.99%

+0.19%

IJH vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJH vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than VOT's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJH and VOT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to IJH (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.18% vs 11.27% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOT.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.61% for VOT.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.07% for VOT.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer