IJH vs. CZA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA).
IJH and CZA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. CZA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. Both IJH and CZA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IJH or CZA.
Performance
IJH vs. CZA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IJH having a 16.85% return and CZA slightly lower at 16.70%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJH having a 10.06% annualized return and CZA not far behind at 9.65%.
IJH
16.85%
0.56%
7.10%
29.49%
11.61%
10.06%
CZA
16.70%
-0.83%
8.94%
27.43%
9.04%
9.65%
Key characteristics
| IJH | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.77 | 2.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.51 | 3.20 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.62 | 3.15 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.27 | 12.31 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.75% | 2.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.97% | 12.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.07% | -53.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.52% | -2.68% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJH vs. CZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CZA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and CZA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IJH vs. CZA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IJH vs. CZA - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than CZA's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.25% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.34% | 1.29% |
CZA Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.89% | 1.42% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.87% | 1.37% | 0.74% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. CZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CZA drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and CZA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IJH vs. CZA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) at 4.12%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.