PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIM vs. NXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IIM vs. NXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (IIM) and Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIM achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than NXP's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IIM has underperformed NXP with an annualized return of 2.16%, while NXP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.17% annualized return.


IIM

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.79%
YTD
5.77%
6M
6.38%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.16%

NXP

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.44%
YTD
3.43%
6M
3.43%
1Y
6.75%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.72%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIM vs. NXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIM
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust
5.77%11.88%8.04%2.05%-25.41%14.13%7.07%18.79%-4.40%7.05%
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
3.43%-2.73%6.83%10.68%-9.51%-7.36%12.12%20.94%0.04%9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IIM and NXP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.22

Over the past year, IIM and NXP have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

IIM:

$0.85

NXP:

$1.60

PE Ratio

IIM:

14.77

NXP:

8.91

PS Ratio

IIM:

8.10

NXP:

12.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

IIM:

$73.01M

NXP:

$60.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IIM:

$54.83M

NXP:

$36.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

IIM:

$51.93M

NXP:

$28.48M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIM vs. NXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIM
IIM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NXP
NXP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXP Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIM vs. NXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (IIM) and Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIMNXPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.01

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

5.02

+0.49

IIM vs. NXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the NXP Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIM and NXP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIM vs. NXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIM drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, which is greater than NXP's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIM and NXP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIMNXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-27.64%

-12.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-3.37%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.20%

-10.68%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-27.64%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

-27.64%

-8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-6.62%

+3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-6.79%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.35%

+1.68%

Volatility

IIM vs. NXP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust (IIM) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) at 2.27%. This indicates that IIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIMNXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.27%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

5.92%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

7.54%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

10.76%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.85%

12.08%

+0.77%

Dividends

IIM vs. NXP - Dividend Comparison

IIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than NXP's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIM
Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust
7.37%7.51%6.58%4.72%5.87%4.51%4.48%4.61%5.43%4.99%5.52%5.20%
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
4.48%4.47%4.00%3.94%3.93%3.42%3.07%3.33%3.88%3.79%3.96%3.99%

Financials

IIM vs. NXP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust and Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M20222023202420252026
22.07M
12.33M
(IIM) Total Revenue
(NXP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IIM and NXP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIM has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to NXP (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIM dropped -40.17% vs NXP's -27.64%.

IIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIM and NXP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer