PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHS vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IHS Holding Limited (IHS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHS achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


IHS

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.10%
YTD
11.26%
6M
16.90%
1Y
47.42%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHS vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IHS
IHS Holding Limited
11.26%155.48%-36.52%-25.20%-56.38%-17.06%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IHS and XMMO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021

0.30

The correlation between IHS and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IHS Holding Limited

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF

Return for Risk

IHS vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHS
IHS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IHS Holding Limited (IHS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHSXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

4.45

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

18.21

-11.69

IHS vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHS and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHSXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.99

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.58

-0.84

Drawdowns

IHS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHS drawdown since its inception was -86.35%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHS and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHSXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.35%

-55.37%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.00%

-8.34%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.06%

-24.93%

-51.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.38%

0.00%

-52.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.60%

-9.45%

-51.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.29%

2.04%

+5.25%

Volatility

IHS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IHS Holding Limited (IHS) is 1.81%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that IHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHSXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

7.82%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.72%

15.54%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.36%

18.71%

+19.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.28%

21.45%

+32.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.28%

22.27%

+32.01%

Dividends

IHS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

IHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHS
IHS Holding Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHS and XMMO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to IHS (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHS dropped -86.35% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHS and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer