PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IHS vs. XMMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IHS and XMMO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

IHS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IHS Holding Limited (IHS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.16%
8.53%
IHS
XMMO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IHS:

0.44

XMMO:

1.11

Sortino Ratio

IHS:

1.13

XMMO:

1.66

Omega Ratio

IHS:

1.13

XMMO:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

IHS:

0.30

XMMO:

2.33

Martin Ratio

IHS:

1.38

XMMO:

5.53

Ulcer Index

IHS:

18.86%

XMMO:

3.92%

Daily Std Dev

IHS:

59.01%

XMMO:

19.46%

Max Drawdown

IHS:

-86.35%

XMMO:

-55.37%

Current Drawdown

IHS:

-77.80%

XMMO:

-6.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHS achieves a 32.53% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 3.51% return.


IHS

YTD

32.53%

1M

20.56%

6M

7.20%

1Y

32.53%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XMMO

YTD

3.51%

1M

-1.40%

6M

8.53%

1Y

26.03%

5Y*

15.73%

10Y*

15.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IHS vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IHS is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IHS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IHS is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IHS is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IHS is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IHS is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMMO is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMMO is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMMO is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IHS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IHS Holding Limited (IHS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IHS, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.441.11
The chart of Sortino ratio for IHS, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.131.66
The chart of Omega ratio for IHS, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for IHS, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.302.33
The chart of Martin ratio for IHS, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.385.53
IHS
XMMO

The current IHS Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHS and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.44
1.11
IHS
XMMO

Dividends

IHS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

IHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IHS
IHS Holding Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.32%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%1.24%

Drawdowns

IHS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHS drawdown since its inception was -86.35%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHS and XMMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-77.80%
-6.07%
IHS
XMMO

Volatility

IHS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

IHS Holding Limited (IHS) has a higher volatility of 18.26% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 5.09%. This indicates that IHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
18.26%
5.09%
IHS
XMMO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab