IHS vs. XMMO
IHS (IHS Holding Limited) is a stock, while XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Over the past 3 years, IHS returned -0.08%/yr vs 32.10%/yr for XMMO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IHS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHS achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.
IHS
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 47.42%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
IHS vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHS IHS Holding Limited | 11.26% | 155.48% | -36.52% | -25.20% | -56.38% | -17.06% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHS and XMMO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between IHS and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHS vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
IHS
XMMO
IHS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IHS Holding Limited (IHS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 4.45 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 18.21 | -11.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.99 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | 0.58 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
IHS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHS drawdown since its inception was -86.35%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHS and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.35% | -55.37% | -30.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.00% | -8.34% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.06% | -24.93% | -51.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.38% | 0.00% | -52.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.60% | -9.45% | -51.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.29% | 2.04% | +5.25% |
Volatility
IHS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IHS Holding Limited (IHS) is 1.81%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that IHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 7.82% | -6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.72% | 15.54% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.36% | 18.71% | +19.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.28% | 21.45% | +32.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.28% | 22.27% | +32.01% |
Dividends
IHS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
IHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHS IHS Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHS and XMMO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to IHS (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHS dropped -86.35% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHS and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer