PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IHG.L vs. BMY.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IHG.LBMY.L
YTD Return35.78%46.08%
1Y Return61.84%65.44%
3Y Return (Ann)26.32%27.56%
5Y Return (Ann)16.98%25.75%
10Y Return (Ann)18.49%19.79%
Sharpe Ratio3.091.88
Sortino Ratio4.182.69
Omega Ratio1.541.32
Calmar Ratio3.634.69
Martin Ratio8.9011.63
Ulcer Index6.75%5.42%
Daily Std Dev19.39%33.52%
Max Drawdown-68.38%-72.41%
Current Drawdown0.00%-10.37%

Fundamentals


IHG.LBMY.L
Market Cap£14.63B£566.81M
EPS£2.99£0.46
PE Ratio30.9615.13
PEG Ratio1.890.00
Total Revenue (TTM)£3.30B£385.77M
Gross Profit (TTM)£1.24B£215.09M
EBITDA (TTM)£862.00M£61.94M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between IHG.L and BMY.L is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IHG.L achieves a 35.78% return, which is significantly lower than BMY.L's 46.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IHG.L has underperformed BMY.L with an annualized return of 18.49%, while BMY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.72%
19.81%
IHG.L
BMY.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterContinental Hotels Group plc (IHG.L) and Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IHG.L, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IHG.L, currently valued at 4.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IHG.L, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IHG.L, currently valued at 3.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IHG.L, currently valued at 9.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.86
BMY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 5.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BMY.L, currently valued at 12.82, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.82

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the BMY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHG.L and BMY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.12
1.92
IHG.L
BMY.L

Dividends

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Dividend Comparison

IHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than BMY.L's 2.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IHG.L
InterContinental Hotels Group plc
1.67%2.01%2.74%0.00%1.83%7.30%2.41%5.27%31.85%1.78%6.36%5.70%
BMY.L
Bloomsbury Publishing plc
2.21%2.99%2.40%5.19%2.78%2.86%3.87%3.68%3.91%4.21%3.73%3.14%

Drawdowns

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHG.L drawdown since its inception was -68.38%, smaller than the maximum BMY.L drawdown of -72.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHG.L and BMY.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.61%
-12.13%
IHG.L
BMY.L

Volatility

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InterContinental Hotels Group plc (IHG.L) is 6.22%, while Bloomsbury Publishing plc (BMY.L) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that IHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.22%
14.48%
IHG.L
BMY.L

Financials

IHG.L vs. BMY.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterContinental Hotels Group plc and Bloomsbury Publishing plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items