IHFAX vs. SIHAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IHFAX (Integrity High Income Fund) and SIHAX (Guggenheim High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, IHFAX returned 5.48%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for SIHAX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHFAX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for SIHAX.

Performance

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Integrity High Income Fund (IHFAX) and Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHFAX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than SIHAX's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IHFAX has outperformed SIHAX with an annualized return of 5.48%, while SIHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.

IHFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 6.89%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.48%

SIHAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 5.07%
• 3Y*: 7.15%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IHFAX Integrity High Income Fund	1.36%	8.27%	7.72%	10.95%	-9.28%	4.91%	6.15%	14.34%	-2.06%	7.22%
SIHAX Guggenheim High Yield Fund	0.80%	6.84%	6.93%	10.74%	-10.51%	4.36%	4.55%	11.26%	-3.17%	6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IHFAX and SIHAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2004	0.74

The correlation between IHFAX and SIHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IHFAX vs. SIHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHFAX

IHFAX Risk / Return Rank: 78
IHFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IHFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IHFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IHFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IHFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SIHAX

SIHAX Risk / Return Rank: 38
SIHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SIHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SIHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SIHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SIHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integrity High Income Fund (IHFAX) and Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IHFAX	SIHAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.58	+0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	2.81	+1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.36	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	2.02	+1.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.62	9.68	+6.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the SIHAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHFAX and SIHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IHFAX	SIHAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.58	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.76	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96	1.02	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.29	-0.46

Drawdowns

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.81%, which is greater than SIHAX's maximum drawdown of -36.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHFAX and SIHAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IHFAX	SIHAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.81%	-36.72%	-13.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.95%	-2.86%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.39%	-3.40%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.49%	-13.95%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.32%	-19.31%	-2.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-2.62%	-1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	0.60%	-0.17%

Volatility

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Integrity High Income Fund (IHFAX) is 0.90%, while Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that IHFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IHFAX	SIHAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	1.14%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.36%	2.58%	-0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03%	3.17%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.08%	4.39%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.75%	4.60%	+1.15%

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHFAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SIHAX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

IHFAX vs. SIHAX - Dividend Comparison

IHFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than SIHAX's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IHFAX Integrity High Income Fund	5.48%	4.99%	5.34%	5.16%	4.79%	3.41%	4.43%	5.21%	5.48%	5.14%	5.16%	5.17%
SIHAX Guggenheim High Yield Fund	6.32%	6.39%	5.45%	4.91%	4.75%	3.70%	4.79%	5.44%	6.86%	5.53%	6.09%	7.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IHFAX and SIHAX in my portfolio?

IHFAX and SIHAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IHFAX or SIHAX?

SIHAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to IHFAX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHFAX dropped -49.81% vs SIHAX's -36.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IHFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.