IHF vs. QQQ
IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHF is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHF returned 8.27%/yr vs 21.84%/yr for QQQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHF charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IHF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IHF has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 8.27%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.
IHF
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 7.98%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 1.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
IHF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 7.93% | 0.92% | -7.90% | -1.11% | -7.11% | 24.46% | 17.67% | 22.34% | 9.56% | 25.45% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHF and QQQ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHF and QQQ has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHF vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHF
QQQ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IHF
QQQ
Financial Services
IHF
QQQ
Technology
IHF
QQQ
Basic Materials
IHF
-
QQQ
Communication Services
IHF
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IHF
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IHF
-
QQQ
Energy
IHF
-
QQQ
Industrials
IHF
-
QQQ
Real Estate
IHF
-
QQQ
Utilities
IHF
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IHF
QQQ
IHF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.44 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 3.42 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | 13.14 | -11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 2.57 | -2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.80 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.98 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
IHF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | -82.97% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.72% | -11.96% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.85% | -22.77% | -7.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | -35.12% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | -35.12% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -0.74% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -32.78% | +22.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 3.11% | +5.40% |
Volatility
IHF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that IHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 4.51% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 12.10% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.73% | 15.94% | +5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 22.37% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 22.29% | -1.27% |
IHF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 1.03% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHF has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHF dropped -58.42% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.84% vs 8.27% for IHF. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IHF.
IHF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
IHF is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IHF and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHF and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer