IHE vs. FXAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).
IHE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. FXAIX is managed by Fidelity.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IHE or FXAIX.
Correlation
The correlation between IHE and FXAIX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IHE vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IHE:
0.49
FXAIX:
1.46
IHE:
0.76
FXAIX:
1.99
IHE:
1.09
FXAIX:
1.27
IHE:
0.62
FXAIX:
2.21
IHE:
1.31
FXAIX:
9.02
IHE:
4.64%
FXAIX:
2.07%
IHE:
12.51%
FXAIX:
12.74%
IHE:
-38.20%
FXAIX:
-33.79%
IHE:
-0.43%
FXAIX:
-3.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHE achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IHE has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.
IHE
10.38%
4.06%
1.43%
6.49%
10.34%
4.15%
FXAIX
1.45%
-0.82%
7.21%
18.87%
16.92%
12.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IHE vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IHE vs. FXAIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IHE
FXAIX
IHE vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IHE vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
IHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than FXAIX's 1.23% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.57% | 1.73% | 1.39% | 2.01% | 1.49% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 1.25% | 1.36% | 0.92% | 1.93% | 1.20% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.23% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 2.01% | 2.56% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
IHE vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHE drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHE and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IHE vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 3.10%. This indicates that IHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Recent discussions
Performance Calculations and Importing Data
Hello,
I am going to be signing up for a paid plan and I am wondering a few things.
First off, the performance calculation on the graph. The information says that it the calculation takes into account splits and dividends. I am assuming that dividends paid are added to the total performance?
Second. The import data is not listed on the "Plus" subscription. It is listed on the "Pro subscription". With my free account I can import a .csv file. How does the "Pro" subscription differ from "Plus" when it comes to importing data?
Thanks,
Travis
Travis Plain
Dividends
Farshad
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG