PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IHC.L vs. AZN.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


IHC.LAZN.L
YTD Return-56.87%-3.74%
1Y Return-56.64%1.13%
3Y Return (Ann)-48.94%6.63%
5Y Return (Ann)-23.07%8.82%
10Y Return (Ann)-10.03%11.52%
Sharpe Ratio-0.70-0.02
Sortino Ratio-0.660.11
Omega Ratio0.831.02
Calmar Ratio-0.57-0.02
Martin Ratio-1.14-0.07
Ulcer Index49.74%6.55%
Daily Std Dev81.07%21.27%
Max Drawdown-99.18%-49.99%
Current Drawdown-99.11%-24.79%

Fundamentals


IHC.LAZN.L
Market Cap£15.47M£154.80B
EPS-£0.14£3.18
Total Revenue (TTM)£34.30M£37.64B
Gross Profit (TTM)£15.39M£30.93B
EBITDA (TTM)-£1.73M£11.50B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between IHC.L and AZN.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IHC.L achieves a -56.87% return, which is significantly lower than AZN.L's -3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IHC.L has underperformed AZN.L with an annualized return of -10.03%, while AZN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.39%
-16.42%
IHC.L
AZN.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspiration Healthcare Group plc (IHC.L) and AstraZeneca plc (AZN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IHC.L, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IHC.L, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IHC.L, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.86
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IHC.L, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IHC.L, currently valued at -1.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.10
AZN.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AZN.L, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AZN.L, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AZN.L, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AZN.L, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AZN.L, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.64

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHC.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the AZN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHC.L and AZN.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.67
0.20
IHC.L
AZN.L

Dividends

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Dividend Comparison

IHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than AZN.L's 2.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IHC.L
Inspiration Healthcare Group plc
1.22%1.55%1.05%0.49%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AZN.L
AstraZeneca plc
2.34%2.21%1.98%2.33%2.95%2.87%3.44%4.28%4.50%3.95%3.73%5.03%

Drawdowns

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHC.L drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than AZN.L's maximum drawdown of -49.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHC.L and AZN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.22%
-26.49%
IHC.L
AZN.L

Volatility

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspiration Healthcare Group plc (IHC.L) is 8.18%, while AstraZeneca plc (AZN.L) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that IHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AZN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.18%
9.46%
IHC.L
AZN.L

Financials

IHC.L vs. AZN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Inspiration Healthcare Group plc and AstraZeneca plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items